I like money better than people. People can so rarely be exchanged for goods and/or services!

Willow ,'Showtime'


Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!

Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.


§ ita § - Aug 31, 2012 8:39:41 am PDT #9624 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Did my crafty disguise not work? Curses! Foiled again!

But, good lord, how stupid.

No, it's not the only way to be strong. But you're probably the sort of assholes that wouldn't recognise any other sort of strength in a guy, so why are you getting agitated now that you have to share?

Sadly, if you do another experiment with women displaying any other sort of strength, the results would probably be less marked, because jackholes like half of those commenters wouldn't notice.


§ ita § - Aug 31, 2012 12:49:19 pm PDT #9625 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

JZ, thank you. That thread is fucking hilarious, with the handful of bile spewing trolls. They know a vagenda when they smell one, that's for sure.


Strega - Sep 01, 2012 11:28:28 am PDT #9626 of 10458

Hm. The episode of Masters of Horrors episode used for its negative portrayals of women was "The Screwfly Solution," which seems problematic. Especially given that a horror program is actively trying to generate anxiety in the audience.

And the Buffy episode included for its portrayal of sexual violence was "The Wish" which... doesn't seem comparable.

The actual paper did at least note that it's difficult to find equivalent programs. The Atlantic summary is... muddled, to say the least.


DebetEsse - Sep 01, 2012 11:43:54 am PDT #9627 of 10458
Woe to the fucking wicked.

Gilmore Girls is also a weird control, as it's very female-centric.


Connie Neil - Sep 10, 2012 2:11:13 pm PDT #9628 of 10458
brillig

So Mark watched "Him." He's wondering if there's a lot of Xander/Spike fanfic out there. I giggled out loud, which is not advisable at work.


Steph L. - Sep 10, 2012 2:37:24 pm PDT #9629 of 10458
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

I'm amused it took him until S7 to wonder that, although I know he's said in past reviews that he's not a shipper, so if he doesn't watch through that lens, it does make sense.


Connie Neil - Sep 10, 2012 2:57:15 pm PDT #9630 of 10458
brillig

There are none so blind as they who will not see.


§ ita § - Sep 11, 2012 11:30:03 am PDT #9631 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Elsewhere I saw a link to this comedian's spec Buffy script: [link] I'm assuming it didn't get him a job writing anywhere, given his IMDB entry, but it was interesting. I've read more Buffy scripts than of any other show, so they're easiest for me to read, by far. I can hear or not hear the characters pretty clearly.

Wow, there's a bit of not-hear in that script. And also Anya's not going to talk like that on actual TV.


erikaj - Sep 11, 2012 12:08:27 pm PDT #9632 of 10458
Always Anti-fascist!

Specs can be a little edgier than filmed scripts, ita. Because their main point is to get attention. Not that that script works anyway, except for Xander.


§ ita § - Sep 11, 2012 1:22:10 pm PDT #9633 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If your point is to look like you can get the voice of a show and write within someone else's framework...nah. Why bother?