Yeah, but you're an amateur fry cook and I come from a long line of fry cooks that don't live past 25.

Buffy ,'Showtime'


Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!

Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.


Liese S. - Jan 13, 2012 7:01:31 am PST #8322 of 10459
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

I read them all, what with having the preteen students all obsessed with them and everything and yeah. Bad all around. But I also feel like at a certain level it's awful for everyone to slam them and everyone who likes them so harshly. I feel like for my vulnerable girls, they get aggressively marketed into liking something and then are ridiculed for liking it. Same thing with boy bands.


§ ita § - Jan 13, 2012 7:04:52 am PST #8323 of 10459
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

at a certain level it's awful for everyone to slam them and everyone who likes them so harshly

I don't really believe in sparing anything just because a lot of people like it, even if it is a vulnerable market. They can like Hunger Games instead, you know?

I only mildly mocked the franchise until I saw one of the movies, and I was really grossed out by it, and now I'm vituperative on the topic. If that dissuades anyone from identifying too closely with what's going on *in a positive way*, I don't apologise.


Liese S. - Jan 13, 2012 7:08:10 am PST #8324 of 10459
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

Yeah, I mean, part of why I slam it myself is because it is SO BAD for them to be walking away with those messages. And yeah, I'm not saying anyone here is mocking preteen girls. But people do, and it makes me mad, too.


erikaj - Jan 13, 2012 7:08:15 am PST #8325 of 10459
Always Anti-fascist!

I think at the targeted age, I might have been a fan, at least of the first one. From where I sit now, I'm entertained by different things. I've also read a lot more books.


Kate P. - Jan 13, 2012 7:19:54 am PST #8326 of 10459
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love

I totally hear you, Liese. I had several discussions with librarian friends a few years back about how to discuss Twilight with the kids in our libraries who loved the books, when we ourselves thought they were so awful. (And they are. I have a whole rant. Terrible on multiple levels, and yet I can so easily see their appeal, too.) Generally I stuck with being honest but brief about my own feelings about the books ("I'm not crazy about them, but tell me why you like them"), and trying to encourage kids to think and talk about them. Sometimes the talk was just "Team Edward!!1!111!" but sometimes it went deeper, and was really interesting.


DavidS - Jan 13, 2012 7:29:18 am PST #8327 of 10459
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Sometimes the talk was just "Team Edward!!1!111!" but sometimes it went deeper, and was really interesting.

I'm curious now - what interesting things did they talk about regarding Twilight?

I'm well acquainted with this dynamic since a big theme of the Bubblegum book was that the genre didn't receive any critical respect because it was aimed at teenaged girls. From that I became quite aware that several things are happening with Bubblegum and Boy Bands that aren't immediately apparent.

For one thing, girls don't just consume that music passively (cf., Bandom). They're selective about what they take from it. Also, it's a way to negotiate ideas of intimacy which are important to them, and the standard cultural narratives don't work for them.


Sophia Brooks - Jan 13, 2012 7:33:34 am PST #8328 of 10459
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Every time I feel annoyed with young girls who like Twilight, I remember how into VC Andrews I was at that age.


askye - Jan 13, 2012 7:38:10 am PST #8329 of 10459
Thrive to spite them

I was also into YA romances, some Sweet Valley High but I really liked the ones where there was some kind of tragedy. The main character had cancer or lost a limb, or the love interest is sick or dies at the end.


Kate P. - Jan 13, 2012 7:43:13 am PST #8330 of 10459
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love

I'm curious now - what interesting things did they talk about regarding Twilight?

Generally the talk about the relationships was the most interesting. Some girls (and though I did know a few boys who read the books, it's mostly the girls who would discuss it with me) were able to articulate pretty well what they found appealing or what they didn't like about Bella and Edward's relationship. I was especially heartened to hear a few of them say that they thought Edward's behavior was actually kind of creepy. It helped me to remember that, as you note, they aren't just taking in these ideas and messages uncritically -- lots of kids who read these books are engaging with them and using them to figure out what they do or don't want in their own relationships.


Fred Pete - Jan 13, 2012 7:47:13 am PST #8331 of 10459
Ann, that's a ferret.

My experience with Twilight is limited to the last movie, but Hec's comment makes it make sense.

I got the feeling that the movie was a decent hokey melodrama dressed up as The! Greatest! Love! Story! Ever! But when you're 12, romantic involvements are something new that you and your peers have never experienced before. So even if the same kind of love story has happened a million times before to a million people, it still feels like the biggest thing in the world when it happens to someone for the first time.

If anyone remembers a Neil Diamond song called "Front Page Story" (though I won't be surprised if only Rio remembers it, and she hasn't been around for ages), it's the same idea.