And he couldn't find a way to squeeze a hint of that into, what, 15 hours of television and a feature film?
I got the hint. I just wanted more.
Dr. Walsh ,'Potential'
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
And he couldn't find a way to squeeze a hint of that into, what, 15 hours of television and a feature film?
I got the hint. I just wanted more.
I'm wondering if bunting is necessitated by series television-- you can only make so many changes to the premise. Is there a show (with more than two seasons) that really lived up to the moral dilemmas presented?
t trots out Farscape
But, yeah, not many.
On network TV, probably not too many.
On cable, there's Farscape, The Shield, Sopranos.
I much prefer the characters having to lie in the beds they have made. I do think there was some of that, though most of the examples I can think of are Wesley-centric
Agreed. That scene in S4 when Willow & Wesley compare notes sums up so much about the differences between the shows. And why I preferred Angel.
Is there a show (with more than two seasons) that really lived up to the moral dilemmas presented?
I don't think it's all that unusual to present dilemmas and show the consequences. Particularly with cop shows. They're not equivalent, really, because few of them are decisions that could lead to humanity being wiped out by demons. The thing is, if you don't want to deal with the consequences, you don't have to present those dilemmas. But if you want to do the aforementioned meloramatic/operatic scenes where people argue about what to do, you have to pay that off.
I'm trying to come up with moments when the Scoobies said "Damn the world" and it worked out anyway and I'm drawing a blank. Buffy said it in Season 5 in regards to Dawn, but she still had to sacrifice herself in order to save her.
The only other moment I can think of is when the Mayor captured Willow and they agreed to exchange the box of Gavrock, or whatever it was called for her, but that wasn't a "world in immediate peril" situation. Yes, the box was part of the mayor's scheme but the world wasn't going to end that night if he got it back. They still had time to find another way to stop him.
It wouldn't be the first time I've forgotten things like this, though.
The one that springs immediately to mind is Willow's "Sorry about the world and all, but I'm working on a spell to save just Tara" comment, and Buffy telling her "Yeah, keep on that -- that's exactly what you should be doing."
The one that springs immediately to mind is Willow's "Sorry about the world and all, but I'm working on a spell to save just Tara" comment, and Buffy telling her "Yeah, keep on that -- that's exactly what you should be doing."
Yeah, but that spell was one of the factors in defeating Glory. Or is that your point of having-it-both-ways?
Yeah, but that spell was one of the factors in defeating Glory.
As a side-effect. Willow's choice was to save Tara at the expense of the world.
So yes, that's having it both ways. The character was allowed to make a potentially world-ending decision, and by the grace of Joss her decision helped everyone.