My favorite scenario was one in which I got to kill Spike.
Dawn ,'Storyteller'
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
Harmony should have gotten the chance to do him in. With her precious wooden unicorn figurine. Or perhaps a tragic emery board accident.
Is the slash phenomena the result of all the poor, traumatized het women who had their illusions destroyed by Spuffy?
With regard to the Buffyverse shows, I think it's the result of Eliza Dushku and Christian Kane shooting enough sparks at their respective leads that you could have landed a 747 by the light.
I liked Spike. It was the Spoldemort faction of his fen that I couldn't stand. Between the Spoldemorts and the kttns, I started having fantasies about bringing down the interbunny, worldwide. Fandom (at large) enriched and enhanced my love for the 'verse for my first few years, and then tried to kill it, from then on in.
I do think in season 7 though, that the writers didn't have a frigging clue what do to with Spike, next. That's too bad. To me, his story read like:
1) We have to have him do something bad enough to motivate him to get a soul.
2) He's different. He has a soul now.
3) Oh shit, that thing he did to motivate him to get the soul was too bad to now let him do what we'd intended for him to do once he had a soul.
4) Maybe we should have him be crazy for a while.
5) Nope. He still ain't coming back from that attempted rape (a.k.a. the a/r in the b/r in SR grr argh).
6) But he's different. He has a soul, now.
7) But he's different. He has a soul, now.
...
100) But he's different. He has a soul, now.
100) But he's different. He has a soul, now.
Snerk.
I thought it was not surprising, but still a bit jarring, that the Angel Spike seemed so different to me than the BtVS Spike. Different writers, of course, but the vibe was...off. Or something.
I liked Spike, too. I think that liking him might have been what stalled the character, though, because I think the writers liked him a little too much, as well.
I thought it was not surprising, but still a bit jarring, that the Angel Spike seemed so different to me than the BtVS Spike. Different writers, of course, but the vibe was...off. Or something.
I think Spike was forced onto the Angel series. My memory of it is that the WB pretty much made hiring JM a term of renewing the show for season 5 (along with all the glass and light; and more stand alones). I don't think Mutant Enemy wanted to let Spike take over the show, or outshine the hairloaf on his own series, and so they made him a little different. I think it worked okay. I wasn't upset he was on there, though.
I also didn't think the Angel writers got the Buffyverse. That's largely okay. Angel stood on its own merits. It was a show featuring adults (as opposed to just out of high school young adults), and was darker, and less mythic/fairy tale feeling. But there were times I thought they mishandled part of Angel's own mythology (making Angel and Angelus into almost two different characters, and somehow, Angel got stupid, which he never had been on BtVS). I also think most of them couldn't write Cordy, for all the tea in China. It was a relief that Fury penned her swan song. She actually talked like Cordelia.
Cordy was Cordy until the end of S2, and with a lot of the same writers who were writing Poddeila.
The combination of an inorganic plot development WRT Cordy/Angel and the subsequent overstretching of the actor's range killed Cordelia as we knew her.
I wasn't upset he was on there, though.
Me, either. As I said, I liked Spike, and still do. And I actually really liked the last season -- much more than the Jasmine/Connor/Poddelia (as Plei called her -- hee) fiasco.
But there were times I thought they mishandled part of Angel's own mythology (making Angel and Angelus into almost two different characters, and somehow, Angel got stupid, which he never had been on BtVS).
Yup. But even so, I think Angel -- or the idea of Angel as a character -- changed even on BtVS. The Angel of the first few episodes (not to mention the Darla) was remarkably different than the Angel he turned out to be.
I can't complain, though. I can't imagine writing an ongoing series, with a team of writers, and having it come out anywhere near consistent. Which, for the most part, aside from a few missteps (Angel hanging with the Rat Pack?!), ME managed to do. When you're not sure if you're series is going to stay on the air, or any idea of how long, it has to be tough to figure out what you *don't* want to do with a character in case of future developments.
I miss Angel. Much more than BtVS most of the time, at least lately. The last season worked really well for me, and it still felt like there was a lot of story left. Whereas, even though I'm one of the few who managed to enjoy S6 BtVS, the last season of Buffy disappointed me nearly every episode. It wasn't at all what I would have done with the final season, not that anyone asked me, and I felt like I didn't know the characters anymore.
Still cried during the last one, though, because I am just that big a sap. (And, to be honest, was also pregnant and hormonal and weeping during laundry detergent commericals.)
Edited to add words that should have been there in the first place.
As crappy as the whole Jasmine story line was, the scene with Angel and Conner singing Oh Jasmine was comedy gold.
I miss Angel too, but then I tell myself it could have dragged on for two more years like Buffy did and completely pissed away any love I felt for it. I think it's better things turned out the way they did.
S5 was my least-loved season of Angel, but I still miss the show.
If S5 had ended with 5x18, it would probably be my second fav season. I just thought the Big Bad Arc was really quite incredibly lame, and that the last episode was a bunch of interesting moments that didn't add up to more than an eyeroll.
I have strong opinions on very silly things, I know.