Dream Girl ,'Bring On The Night'
A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much any other "genre" show that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
Heh. No.
I can see how Green Wing reviews might have been a bit mixed. They did a few weird things (stylistically, not just weird events...which are normal), and the pacing is kind of funky. But I still think the secretaries should get their own spin-off.
...the 2006 series of Doctor Who starts Easter Weekend.
Yay! I'd guessed it was going to be then, though the BBC is still saying date "to be announced" at this point. It had started by this time last year.
I have the Children in Need snippet on our digital video recorder but don't think I can get it out in any meaningful format, unfortunately. Nothing much happens except that (spoiler font) Rose is confused and wants "her" Doctor back, and the new Doctor realises his Regeneration is going wrong.
This week's Doctor Who-blogging by the Flick Filosopher brings up the fanfiction aspects of the revival, especially Rose's Mary Sue tendencies and the 'shippiness of the Rose/Doctor friendship/whatever it is.
I am down with the shipperness, but Mary Sue? I gotta go read the blog.
If Rose were a Mary Sue, she wouldn't screw up. She also wouldn't (spoiler for Christmas Invasion) be helpless in the Doctor's absence. (Which I didn't like, but had to accept in that context.)
Fiona, that was my favorite bit: when the Doctor said "Do you want me to change back?" and Rose said "YES!" and he froze, obviously having expected a no.
Having read the entry, I'm no more convinced. She's a viewer's gaze character, but that's not the same sort of sugary authorial insertion I think makes a Mary Sue so special.
eta: And I think making the viewer's gaze character a bit more effective and sexual has a lot to do with changing audiences.
It's an overall glowing review -- I agree that the reviewer that it's wonderful to see that the Companion's absence from her family causes real trauma -- our girl just vanished for no apparent reason.
As to helping out the Doctor (which seems to be the main accusation, apart from being pretty, which is frankly a given from a female lead) -- there are two options available: the passive girl who is there to be rescued and to give the Doctor a chance to explain things, or the agent (in the litcrit sense) who acts effectively. Hands up everybody who prefers Tegan to Sarah Jane Smith.
Rose certainly could have been a Mary Sue, but I think she has too many flaws and limitations. A Mary Sue would drive the Tardis, become a virtuoso with the sonic screwdriver, and save the Doctor's life every episode.
As it is, she's only saved him maybe twice! See, not a Mary Sue. :-)
(In case anyone is wondering, my big old Kid Dynamo novel has its Mary Sue-like tendencies, so I only poke fun in a light way.)
she's only saved him maybe twice!
Only when it *really* counts. Hmmmm....