Lorne: My little prince. Oh…what did they do to you? Angel: Nina…tried to…eat me. Lorne: Oh, you're--medic! You're gonna make it Angel. Just don't stop fighting. Doctor! Is there a Gepetto in the house?

'Smile Time'


Natter 33 1/3  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Anne W. - Mar 14, 2005 10:41:25 am PST #7106 of 10002
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.

Aside from that, I simply dislike the attitude of people who don't have children who vote against taxes which support schools primarily because they have an "I don't benefit from it so why should I pay" attitude.

Speaking as a childless person, wrod. How can I say I don't benefit from better funded schools? After all, the people who will be providing various services for me in my decripitude will be going through those schools.


§ ita § - Mar 14, 2005 10:41:45 am PST #7107 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I really don't believe that's an even bet.

I think a parent can make it better than even, with rigourous attention to detail -- in favour of homeschooling. I'm not saying all or most do, but that's a parental failing, not a failing of the premise.

Oh god yes.

Does the empatic nature of this response imply that a parent with homeschooling will be received with as much respect for their opinions as someone who's "put their money where their mouth is"? In places, perhaps, where they aren't so excited about gay black Big Brothers?


brenda m - Mar 14, 2005 10:42:41 am PST #7108 of 10002
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Speaking as a childless person, wrod. How can I say I don't benefit from better funded schools? After all, the people who will be providing various services for me in my decripitude will be going through those schools.

Plus, it keeps the kids offa my lawn.


shrift - Mar 14, 2005 10:43:10 am PST #7109 of 10002
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

that does not sound workplace appropriate.

Well, I'm alone in my office today, so it's not like I'm playing Sex Bomb over the intercom for the entire office to hear... although now I really, really want to.


Jesse - Mar 14, 2005 10:44:07 am PST #7110 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I don't think smart kids suffer too much from mediocre schools. I think they'll excel anyway, and they'll get happy teacher attention.

I think that REALLY depends on the kid. And the teacher. I had some mediocre teachers, including one who told my parents how happy she was to have me in class, since she didn't have to pay any attention to me.


sumi - Mar 14, 2005 10:44:37 am PST #7111 of 10002
Art Crawl!!!

ION, Bono enters the rag trade.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 14, 2005 10:44:59 am PST #7112 of 10002
What is even happening?

Am I prepared to sacrifice my child's education to prop up the education of the country as a whole?
I'm not. I live in a town with a decent public school system, but my loyalty lies with my kids. If our schools were to go down hill or change in some way that I couldn't fight, but that I found unsuitable for my children, I wouldn't necessarily move, to keep my child in public school

I don't think there's a one-true-way with schooling, any more than there is with parenting (including sahm-ness, daycare, extended family care).

Is there a place for people without children in them to help fix the public schools?
Yes, there are fewer opportunities for non-parents or parents of matriculated students, but they're there. Most school committee meetings are open to the public, and there is a time for the public to comment on the matters at hand. Also, any financial sort of vote a person makes at the polls (re property taxes, etc.) affects the public schools.

As for the religious whackjobs -- if your agenda is (mostly) the one in charge, well, of course keep your kids in public education. But if they were being taught creationism, racism, sexism or homophobia, and you couldn't get the school to stop (or decided that's fine for those who're okay with the values, but not your kids), why not homeschool? I'm sure that's what it looks like to the "whackjobs."

Yes. There will be topics I will not want the schools to broach with my children. There may be topics I would be okay, in theory, with the school handling, but I may not like how our particular schools do it. There will probably be subjects I wish the schools would address, that they'll fail to. All schools are institutions, not custom built to our children, and the kind of input you have in a public school is different than what you might find in a private school.


Nutty - Mar 14, 2005 10:50:20 am PST #7113 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Then they should have been homeschooled to avoid the bad science, or find a university that keeps teaching it.

The point is, the parents and kids alike don't get that they're learning bad science till the kid is failing college Bio 101. The parents make a political decision without necessarily thinking through the practical needs of cultural (or scientific) comprehensibility.

(I expect it's possible to major in biology at, like, Bob Jones University, but then you'd be forced to get your doctorate at a similarly out-there school, and the pool of places that would give you tenure would be small. And that whole trajectory sort of depends on the student being able to decide "Yes, I'll be an outsider in my field for the rest of my life" -- and still being happy with that decision decades later.)


§ ita § - Mar 14, 2005 10:51:44 am PST #7114 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The point is, the parents and kids alike don't get that they're learning bad science till the kid is failing college Bio 101.

Fair enough, but I think that for the informed parent, it supports homeschooling. Or not, if the informed parent agrees with what's being taught, and the effect it may have on Bob's PhD.


DavidS - Mar 14, 2005 10:52:18 am PST #7115 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I just want to note this: yes, those *are* choices, but sometimes, Hec, you come across as though the only correct choice is the one that you support. But really, there's often more than one correct choice.

Sorry Tep, I really don't feel like I'm making a judgement about individual choices here at all, and I've tried to make that clear. As noted, I don't expect anybody to sacrifice their child on a poor public education. I wouldn't, and I've paid for Emmett's schooling before, and it was the right choice at the time. There are way too many variables involved in the decision to make a blanket judgement on it (despite my tendencies.)

I see the trend toward home schooling dangerous to the democratic ideal which I value. First people pulled their kids out of public schools. Then they started pulling them out of school altogether. I don't think that's the right direction. People don't seem as invested or committed to public education as they once did. And also I dislike the shift toward closed, hermetic, anti-social parenting.

But both of these objections are matters to be considered on balance. On the respective scales, I think they both represent a shift away from healthiest/best social values (my opinion, obviously). But I would like to see the weights moved more to the middle. I would like to see the value of public education more heavily weighted and valued. I would like to see more recognition of the virtue of social connection and community, rather than Me/Mine/Ours.