also? BIG soda at lunch. caffeine. WATCH OUT!

I triumphed over Canuckistan and obtained my caffeine, and have been sending apologetic e-mails like whoa. One more e-mail and an apologetic phone call to go, and I think the mess will no longer earn me a talk with the boss.

But first I must listen to Michael, you're the boy with all the leather hips / sticky hair, sticky hips, stubble on my sticky lips really, really loudly.

Here, too.

I presume it's fairly common but only really know from my own experience. And while treading such volatile subject matter decided (for once) to keep my ex cloaca commentary localized.

I don't think homeschooling will harm the child any more than public schooling won't. Am I prepared to sacrifice my child's education to prop up the education of the country as a whole? I think many parents would not (my MP cousin in the UK got busted on just this). Is there a place for people without children in them to help fix the public schools?

As for the religious whackjobs -- if your agenda is (mostly) the one in charge, well, of course keep your kids in public education. But if they were being taught creationism, racism, sexism or homophobia, and you couldn't get the school to stop (or decided that's fine for those who're okay with the values, but not your kids), why not homeschool? I'm sure that's what it looks like to the "whackjobs."

that does not sound workplace appropriate.

one thing about knowing your job is ending. No real need to apologize for mistakes.

my mantra when dealing with this one-coworkers is "Suck it Trebec" in my inside the head voice.

Sometimes that's untenable, for a myriad of reasons. Parent(s) can't get a job in the new location, the family currently lives somewhere where they're tied to extended family -- by choice, etc.

The point is that those are choices. I am well conscious of "untenable" and also know that if you put everything on the table, things are more tenable than most people think. It's like the family at JZ's hospital that she talked about who had the child whose heart condition made him suffer at high altitudes. They needed to move, but they wouldn't because they'd lose close family ties. I think that's a poor balancing of all the priorities. They thought it was untenable - but it really wasn't.

I am a major public school advocate. however, I can think of a number of people who don't fit the mold. Takeing a cild out for a year - like ouise- sounds like a good stratagy. and I can think of a number of high school students ( my DH was one) that are self motivated kids , that get stiffled in the high school program. When there are things like sudden drops in grades - there are reasons. But there are kids that do the opposite. a friends's oldest never did well in school. he is now in a high school with a block system - that means he is only has three classes at anyone time. Which works better for him.

I think all parents have to say about school at some point : "Yes, they teach that at school. But I think it's important you learn this..." Or is that because I was little crippled child hippie-spawn?

Awwwwww.

I have returned.... how's Ginger?

Como esta el povre gringo che necesita ajuda?

As for the religious whackjobs -- if your agenda is (mostly) the one in charge, well, of course keep your kids in public education.

Well, there's something to be said for being familiar with the mainstream -- and knowing when you're in it and when you're not. I haev nothing but pity for the kids who grow up in small-town Kansas, learning bad science about evolution, and then arrive at college ready to major in biology, only to find they may need remedial classes.

It's one thing to learn X, and then say, "I don't agree with X" or "I don't want to study X" or "I want to eradicate X from all our lives"; but it's another thing entirely not to have any exposure to X in the first place.

Signed,
hated mushrooms on sight till many years later, when I was convinced to try them and realized I liked them a lot.

The point is that those are choices.

God, I've typed and deleted 3 different responses to this, and they're all devolving into defensiveness and serious anger on my part.

I'm not feeling well today; I'm getting a cold, and I feel feverish. So I'm not going to let loose with unwarranted anger, here.

I just want to note this: yes, those *are* choices, but sometimes, Hec, you come across as though the only correct choice is the one that you support. But really, there's often more than one correct choice.

That's all. I'm going to disengage until I'm less bombarded by Germs O' Doom.