First of all, 'Posse?' Passé

Cordelia ,'Potential'


The Great Write Way, Chapter Two: Twice upon a time...  

A place for Buffistas to discuss, beta and otherwise deal and dish on their non-fan fiction projects.


Typo Boy - Aug 20, 2007 6:04:56 am PDT #9295 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Drabble challengers, related, together or separately: "Low" "Deep". (Non-porny).


Susan W. - Aug 25, 2007 6:35:56 pm PDT #9296 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

With 50% of precincts reporting in, my CPs are thus far unanimous in rejecting a scene I was rather proud of.

t cue chorus of self-doubt

Normally the combination of pride over something you've written and CPs/betas disliking it means you need to kill that particular darling...but I'm still stubbornly clinging to this one. This is my Regency romance group, and I'm now writing Regency-era non-romance. The issue in question is whether two of my characters should have sex at this point in the story. So far one CP is saying, basically, that it's not romantic enough for her--she seems to have trouble with sympathetic characters deciding to have comfort sex when both the text and what I've told her of the plot to follow make it clear they'll part soon and end up with other people. The second says it's just a throwaway sex scene like male adventure writers keep throwing in to please their female readers regardless of its relevance to the plot, and I shouldn't follow their bad example. Thing is, I guess I'm one of those pleased female readers, because I like the way the one author on her list I've actually read handles sex scenes. They don't seem throwaway to me.

Sigh. Really can't decide what to think of this. I mean, they're my characters, and their having sex seemed completely inevitable to me. I'd love to be able to chalk this up to my CPs using a romance standard for a non-romance story, but that might be a cop-out.


Zenkitty - Aug 26, 2007 4:54:05 am PDT #9297 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

I'd love to be able to chalk this up to my CPs using a romance standard for a non-romance story, but that might be a cop-out.

Or you might be right!

You know, some people just don't like sex scenes if they're not followed by true love and marriage, and some people just don't like them at all. The curtain should always be tastefully drawn after the passionate kiss.

Me, I like sex scenes. Clearly, you should let me read it and decide.


Susan W. - Aug 26, 2007 6:40:24 am PDT #9298 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

Zenkitty, I'd be happy to send it to you for a second opinion, but you might be disappointed--it's quite tame. PG, maybe PG-13. The only person I know who'd be shocked by it is my mother.


Zenkitty - Aug 26, 2007 7:09:08 am PDT #9299 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Send it on, then - profile addy is good.


Susan W. - Aug 26, 2007 7:46:39 am PDT #9300 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

Insent, Zenkitty--thanks!


Zenkitty - Aug 26, 2007 10:41:50 am PDT #9301 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Reading now, Susan. I'm into it, it's good. I may be making more notes than you wanted, though. me = OCD.


Zenkitty - Aug 26, 2007 11:08:13 am PDT #9302 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Susan, insent back at'cha.


Typo Boy - Aug 26, 2007 1:18:59 pm PDT #9303 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

I don't seem to have the knack for issuing drabble challenges, so passing the match on to whoever wants to take it up, in hopes they will use it to light a torch.


erikaj - Aug 26, 2007 5:47:01 pm PDT #9304 of 10001
Always Anti-fascist!

It's not you, it's me. Haven't got drabble -fu lately.