Thanks Jon.
And we live to fight another day.
Mal ,'Objects In Space'
Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
tommyrot - Oct 20, 2004 11:52:37 am PDT #4965 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
§ ita § - Oct 20, 2004 11:53:58 am PDT #4966 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I meant real live sex
Like ejaculation real live?
See -- yiffing.
Jars - Oct 20, 2004 11:57:30 am PDT #4967 of 10001
ita, I was once told that furries like dressing up as animals, whereas plushies prefer the company of actual soft toys.
Whether that's acurate or not, I couldn't say.
Matt the Bruins fan - Oct 20, 2004 11:59:16 am PDT #4968 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Not an expert (thank God!), but I also had the impression that with plushies there was only one actual living human being involved in the goings-on.
Aims - Oct 20, 2004 12:00:27 pm PDT #4969 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
(I was starting wonder where you were, babe)
Training my replacement - I'll be pretty dark for the next few weeks during the day. :(
§ ita § - Oct 20, 2004 12:00:41 pm PDT #4970 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Wikipedia is my new best friend.
Thanks, Jars. I suppose lingering looks at Nightcrawler are plushie then.
Hmm.
Kate P. - Oct 20, 2004 12:28:37 pm PDT #4971 of 10001
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love
Heh. You do know that the Disney version of Robin Hood is one of the most important reference sources among the furries, right?
That's okay, David, I wasn't using the cherished innocence of my childhood anyway.
Edit: although ita's link makes it seem not quite so bad. I was under the impression that furries were first and foremost a fetish community, but apparently it's bigger than that.
§ ita § - Oct 20, 2004 12:30:40 pm PDT #4972 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I wasn't using the cherished innocence of my childhood anyway.
Well, apparently not, unless you're a closet furry.
Kate P. - Oct 20, 2004 12:35:49 pm PDT #4973 of 10001
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love
Heh. I knew I should have tried to rephrase that...
DavidS - Oct 20, 2004 1:40:12 pm PDT #4974 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Inflationists I think Hec made up.
Nope. But I don't think that name is accurate. V/Search had a book on all kinds of kinks and a big chapter on them. They had a whole chapter on people who were aroused by images of people being inflated, either whole (as Violet was in Willy Wonka), or in part (like...cartoon boobies inflating). They like to wear big suits that inflate and cause pressure all over their person.
Deviant Desires: Incredibly Strange Sex
From an Amazon review:
In Deviant Desires, author Katharine Gates goes for the jugular. Leaving the relatively "normal" realms of BDSM (Bondage & Discipline/SadoMasochism), transgenderism, and shrimping behind, the topics explored in Deviant Desires are completely "off the map" in comparison. Ranging from in-depth chapters on Pony Play to Balloon Fetishes with stops along the way about Giantesses, Crushing, and Fat fans, Gates raises the bar with each chapter. Even our old pal Romain Slocombe (see above) makes an appearance with his Broken Dolls photography near the end of the book.
My favorite chapter has to be the "catch all" finale to the book that addresses (among other things) attraction to androids ("My Living Doll" anyone?) and erotic fan fiction. The drawings of popular science fiction characters in compromising positions aren't easy to forget.
Gates is highly respectful of her subjects, neither exploiting them nor psychoanalyzing them. The fun the people have with their fetishes is apparent and rather "normalizing"! While the idea of people enjoying themselves while not indulging in "vanilla sex" may be offensive to some, this book is for the silent, (a)moral majority!