Was She's All That really that much more successful than Can't Hardly Wait?

And don't they both owe Clueless a lot for softening the market?

Now I'm curious about the comic book movie craze. I agree that X-Men was hysterically successful, but there was still quite a lull between that and a bunch of high-profile actors putting on the spandex.

When I had chicken pox, back in 1987, I watched

That's when I had chicken pox! Only, I watched Mannequin about 90,000 times, and I made everyone else watch it too.

ETA:

Is Netflix better than Blockbuster online? Because Blockbuster seems to offer the same thing, and is two dollars cheaper.

Rachel Leigh Cook will always be the chick who destroyed the kitchen against drugs.

Oh, shit. Really?

Does the Blockbuster service offer edited DVDs, like they were reputed to be "for contenting" their videos?

Me, I like Netflix because they were there first, and have the luxury of never having me had a confrontation with idiot clerks, which drove me away from Blockbuster as soon as I first heard of Netflix. Sour taste, not gone.

Well, according to IMDB, She's All That did $63,319,509 (domestic) on a $10 million budget, while Can't Hardly Wait did $25,339,117 on the same budget. So, um, yes.

Was She's All That really that much more successful than Can't Hardly Wait?

And don't they both owe Clueless a lot for softening the market?

That's a point. I don't remember when/why I deemed it, say, a cultural touchstone, but there may be a better candidate for "kicking off the teen movie craze of the 90s which bled into the 00s."

I agree that X-Men was hysterically successful, but there was still quite a lull between that and a bunch of high-profile actors putting on the spandex.

Well, there was a lull, yes, because the movies had to get made. I think after X-Men is when all the online buzz involved comic-book movies, because you had a big-name director attached to one. Thus Ang Lee took Hulk and John Woo took Ninja Turtles... which never managed to surface. If not X-Men, what would you suggest? Spider-Man ?

Damn. How wrong was I? Clueless did $56M on twice that budget. Shows how off-kilter my perceptions are. And I have to mentally be nicer to FPJr too. This bites.

Hey, does this mean I was more right than ita?

savors this moment

If nothing else, I give She's All That props for embodying so many of the genre tropes that Not Another Teen Movie sent up so hilariously.

Watched Denied today. The editing made Lost Highway look linear, and I'll bet more than half the run time was taken up by black screens between scenelets. Sound and picture quality made me wonder if I was following in Helen Keller's footsteps. If you're tempted to watch this movie, look at this promotional shot instead. It's much better than anything actually in the movie.

Me, I like Netflix because they were there first, and have the luxury of never having me had a confrontation with idiot clerks, which drove me away from Blockbuster as soon as I first heard of Netflix. Sour taste, not gone.

That's very fair. I have no idea about edited dvd's, but what a crappy idea, either way. I'm just thinking $2 x 12= a little more than one free month! Awesome. But I don't think I could really afford it, either way. My paycheck basically covers grocery shopping and the occasional bookstore necessity visit. And the only dvd player that I have is my computer. Of course, I do have the AV cables to connect my computer to my tv, but I think there's only a one inch difference in screen size, so that's not particularly helpful. Oh well. Either way, I'll be out of school soon, so hopefully I can afford things one day in the nearish future. I'm just window shopping, for now.