Quentin is one fucked up dude.
I was thinking the exact same thing today when Uma was burried alive.
'Bring On The Night'
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Quentin is one fucked up dude.
I was thinking the exact same thing today when Uma was burried alive.
Yep, that was one of the places that thought went through my head.
And how funny we were both watching that today, tommy. Spooooky.
I saw A Home at the End of the World tonight. It wasn't what I'd expected at all, though I think it was pretty good. And seeing Sissy Spacek puffing on doobies throughout was quite the treat.
I had to fight a horrified reaction early on when the actor who plays Hunter on Queer as Folk popped up as the teenage version of Dallas Roberts' character. Not that he did a bad job in the movie, but my automatic reaction to him is "Kill it! Kill it before it can sulk again!"
Betsy, I saw Hero today, too, and I agree with all your points, and Dana's. Best to just let the colors and the images and Perlman's violin wash over you, and not worry too much about the plot(s).
DH and I saw it together, and we rashly disregarded Jess's advice to NOT read the cards before and after the actual movie. The next to final one said, "to this day, the people of China refer to their homeland as"
and DH and I both said "This land" as the "Our Land" card went up. And then I did dinosaur noises and he said "I think we should call it your grave! Die, die!"
Yeah, pretty much ruined the mood. In short? Listen to Jessica. Don't read the cards.
Quick meara: I love The Fifth Element and Moulin Rouge. I like Big Fish, but am not gloriously in love with it. The Apple is splendiferously ridiculous, and I think we are all the better for having seen it.
And since Nutty and I disagree so often:
I would call The Thin Red Line about 80% narrative-free, focussing instead on the beauty of the landscape (that the soldiers are churning up as they cross it). The other 20% was dress rehearsal for The Passion of the Christ, so I coulda lived without it anyway. But, you know, some people did like it. (Me, I like Malick more when he can make his sense of beauty serve a story.)
I hate The Thin Red Line with a fiery passion.
P-C and I are one! Perhaps for this movie and no other.
I hate The Thin Red Line with a fiery passion.
Me, too. Therefore, P-C is less dead to me now.
What do folks hate about The Thin Red Line? I liked it when I saw it, but I don't remember much at all of it.
A military historian says that the movie version suffered from "Hollywoodization" when compared to the original book, which is considered one of the greatest military novels, and an accurate portrayal of the fighting on Guadalcanal. (I haven't read the book, but it's on my list of books to buy.)
What do folks hate about The Thin Red Line?
It's relentlessly boring, there's no narrative flow, the characters spout faux poetry as if it were profound, and I want those three hours back.
I didn't like The Thin Red Line because it didn't feel like it had a plot (or for that matter a point), because it fetishized nature, because (more criminally, to me) it fetishized the local peoples as part of nature, because it felt like a collective "we're arty!" wank, because as far as I could tell there was little reason for it to be set during World War II.
James Jones has quite the rep as a WWII author (having written the novels From Here to Eternity and A Soldier's Daughter Never Cries as well as this one, so I imagine that this movie adaptation would be the same thing as if someone made The Caine Mutiny Court Martial or Mila 18 into a tone poem. Kind of like making ice cream using liquid nitrogen: cute, but not really an efficient use of nitrogen.)