Edited: Because "Wratch" isn't a word.
It's not? Damn!
*scratches wratch from his dickshonehairy*
Actually, the only thing that makes
Star Wars
science fiction is the spaceships, lasers and aliens. All of which could be substitued for horses/cars/tanks, six-shooters/katanas/sub-machine guns and "Indians"/rival clans/Nazis (or North Koreans).
The final attack on the Death Star was "stolen" from the Korean War movie,
The Bridges at Toko-Ri.
Lucas also "borrowed" heavily from a Kurosawa movie but it was
Hidden Fortress
more than
Yojimbo.
He was also influenced by a bunch of other movies from a variety of genres. All of which he has readily admitted to in interviews, or so I've been led to believe.
Just to weigh in on the Star Wars discussion, Kurosawa constantly acknowledged that his greatest influence as a scriptwriter and director was John Ford. His movies were rarely well-received in Japan until the end of his career (which partially explains his two decades of silence between the 60s and the 80s), but always played well in the West, where audiences were more familiar with his Western tropes. Personally, I think Kurosawa's samurai movies are typically better Westerns than the Westerns based on them. Yojimbo and Sanjuro, for instance, are ten times as gritty as A Fistful of Dollars and For A Few Dollars More, and The Magnificent Seven is barely comparable to The Seven Samurai. Even The Hidden Fortress, which at least partially inspired Star Wars (well, at least, part of the plot, many of the characters, and the silly-fun screen-wipes), has its origins in The Searchers, which was one of Kurosawa's favorite films.
xpost with Evil Jimi.
He was also influenced by a bunch of other movies from a variety of genres.
Including TRIUMPH OF THE WILL.
Uh oh. If I sounded kerfuffly it was completely unintentional.
Oh, not at all! This is just one of those gerund-like topics that seem to always end in tears and recriminations.
Uh oh. If I sounded kerfuffly it was completely unintentional.
Oh, not at all! This is just one of those gerund-like topics that seem to always end in tears and recriminations.
Jessica got here before me to say the same thing. There was a kerfluffle in the past about this very issue (though I didn't know it, because I don't subscribe to the thread in which it happened), so it has Kerfluffle Bait writ large all over it.
My God. They made a sequel to Baby Geniuses.
Jon Voight called into a local radio station this morning to promote this piece of go-su (or the equivalant Chinese spelling for the word shit).
He said something about being the 'villian' and that was the last word spoken about the film. The rest of the interview consisted of the djs fawning over films he made 30 years ago.
I'd have been sad for him except...I'm pretty sure he's a creep. Or maybe just someone I'd rather not know. Which is convenient, since it's very unlikely I ever might.
Are y'all saying that people fight over whether or not Star Wars is a space western?
I was just surprised that Star Trek 2: The Wrath Of Khan wasn't on there. The ONLY Trek film to have any real cinematic integrity, as opposed to just being for the fans.
Oh, I'd say that Undiscovered Country had some cinematic integrity as well, but only by virtue of being directed by Nicholas Meyer, same as Wrath of Khan.
::tears up Beej's invite to the Voight fete::
Are y'all saying that people fight over whether or not Star Wars is a space western?
It was the whole concept of science fiction as western, wasn't it? It'd be back in the beginning of the first Firefly thread.
