Worse than Arthur 2: On The Rocks? 'Cause that movie was known to blind the unsuspecting.
Gabriel: Are you trying to destroy this family? Simon: I didn't realize it would be so easy.
'Safe'
Buffista Movies 3: Panned and Scanned
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Hayden - Jul 09, 2004 1:18:27 pm PDT #30 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."
Miracleman - Jul 09, 2004 1:18:48 pm PDT #31 of 10001
No, I don't think I will - me, quoting Captain Steve Rogers, to all of 2020
Worse than First Knight?
That's a lot of damnation.
There is nothing worse than First Knight.
§ ita § - Jul 09, 2004 1:20:08 pm PDT #32 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
There is nothing worse than First Knight.
Yup. Even the porn ripoff (Fist Night) is far superior.
Hayden - Jul 09, 2004 1:21:17 pm PDT #33 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."
Maybe y'all didn't see Arthur 2: On the Rocks. Or perhaps you're using vision-assistance computers.
§ ita § - Jul 09, 2004 1:22:35 pm PDT #34 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Maybe y'all didn't see Arthur 2: On the Rocks. Or perhaps you're using vision-assistance computers.
You're one of those tinfoil hatters, aren't you?
I bet you think there was a Highlander 2.
Hayden - Jul 09, 2004 1:25:05 pm PDT #35 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."
You're one of those tinfoil hatters, aren't you?
I bet you think there was a Highlander 2.
The voices in my head say that there was, but I think they're working for the CIA or FDA.
P.M. Marc - Jul 09, 2004 1:32:50 pm PDT #36 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
I think I own First Knight.
Err. For someone's bit part, so hush.
Gary OLDMAN is James Gordon? How did I miss that? They should switch him with Caine.
They've managed to make him look perfect for it, and at 46, he's about the right age for the part.
Aims - Jul 09, 2004 1:32:54 pm PDT #37 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
And there's NOT a new Highlander movie in 2005. Nope, nuh-uh.
Sue - Jul 09, 2004 1:35:19 pm PDT #38 of 10001
hip deep in pie
Worse than First Knight?
Okay, I'll admit to not seeing that.
I was bored, and I'd rather it be spectacularily bad than be bored.
§ ita § - Jul 09, 2004 1:37:58 pm PDT #39 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
They've managed to make him look perfect for it, and at 46, he's about the right age for the part.
But he's so slight. Like Alfred.
there's NOT a new Highlander movie in 2005.
Well, if Methos is there, so am I.