Under DGA guidelines, only one name can be listed under the Director banner.
That's fucking stupid.
A place to talk about movies--Old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Under DGA guidelines, only one name can be listed under the Director banner.
That's fucking stupid.
I finally saw The Crow. And, surprisingly enough, it's something to crow about. Softly, at least. It's much more successful than Alex Proyas' next movie, Dark City. Because unlike that movie, it doesn't have a lot of pretensions of being deep and meaningful. Well, besides the "Love conquers all" voiceovers, which are fairly harmless. Basically, it's a revenge pic in which the instrument of vengeance is already dead, so he has nothing to lose. After the first twenty minutes or so, the movie really picks up and it wasn't until the point of Oh Wait I Need a Climax that I realized what a great job Proyas had done: he had sustained almost the entire movie with no narrative tension whatsoever. Eric is invulnerable; he dispatches his foes with relative ease. Yet, it's compelling, and there are some wonderful shots, especially the slow burn of gasoline as it forms the shape of the crow.
Of course, it's not perfect. People accept that this guy's back from the dead way too easily, and all Eric's flashbacks are generic They Were So Happy Together scenes. And while it's probably best they don't try to explain the mythology, a teensy bit more might have been nice. But all in all, it's nicely done, and it annoys me that there are so many rehash "sequels," the latest one starring David Boreanaz (and for some reason, ditching the Crow name).
Boreanaz playing an undead avenger?
Huh.
Boreanaz playing an undead avenger?
No, actually, he plays some murderous gang leader who wants to ascend to demonhood or something.
I like the anthology potential (it's keeping in spirit with the comics), but, yeah, they've all been crap.
I like the anthology potential (it's keeping in spirit with the comics)
Do the comics just have different characters being brought back? Okay. But yeah, if they're not done as well as the first, I won't bother.
Do the comics just have different characters being brought back?
They do have multiple Crows, yeah.
I liked the first Crow. And got all caught up in the tragedy of the Lee family prophesy. Plus, Michael Wincott is creepy-fun. But the rest were, indeed, crap.
Yet another example of terrific potential squandered.
Hmph. My dog has fallen heavily asleep on my foot, which has, in turn, fallen asleep. I take this as a sign that the rest of me should follow.
::comeon Bartleby, let's go chase squirrels in our dreams...::
That comment was just me not wanting to come off as a union basher.
Unions, like most things, need the occasional bashing. For all the good things they've done, they've also done a lot of shitty things.
Signed,
Not Bitter A Union Cost Me A Full-time Job
Boreanaz playing an undead avenger?
No, actually, he plays some murderous gang leader who wants to ascend to demonhood or something.
He's the Mayor?