The Mayor ,'End of Days'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I'm willing to consense on this issue (HP7 spoiling in the Zombie Book Club Thread, no whitefont, till 4 weeks after hardcover release in the US), but once we've done so, I advocate that somebody do a linky announce what we've consensed in the Annoucements thread.
Because I would never intuit what we're doing from any of the discussion of it in Literary, and I had to think really hard to come up with that summary above.
I think HP should be white fonted in the general threads for at least one month - which would coincide with the re-closing of the BBC thread.
I'm willing to consense on this issue (HP7 spoiling in the Zombie Book Club Thread, no whitefont, till 4 weeks after hardcover release in the US), but once we've done so, I advocate that somebody do a linky announce what we've consensed in the Annoucements thread.
Nutty speaketh for me.
Adding my support for the Nutty consense.
As do I.
Me too!
I'm suddenly obsessed with how No Preference actually tends to play out, but it's pretty tangential to the Lightbulbs discussion, so I'll ask here. For a Yes or No vote to win, does it need 50% +1 of the total votes, including No Preference (if that's on the ballot), or 50% +1 of just the Yes/No votes even if there are NP votes?
So if:
NP=14, Y=14, N=15 --- does that mean N wins? Or would Y or N (or NP, for that matter) need at least 22 to win?
In practice, it's been 50%+1 of the yes/no votes. In fact, on the second item here Jesse "Sunnydale Press" Jul 2, 2007 6:10:09 pm PDT the winning choice and no preference are identical. It seems that lots of people vote no preference for whatever reason, maybe to help get quorum, maybe to be present, but the net result is that a relative small number of votes (and not 50%) wins.
This actually bugs me enough that I may propose that we stop allowing or having no preference. Or at least make it 50% +1 of ALL votes, not just the votes with content.
"A simple majority vote is sufficient to enact changes for any issue brought up for vote." (Press #367) "Simple majority" means 50%+1. This may result in the need for runoff votes or other strategies, depending on how ballots are written.
Votes of "no preference" count toward this Minimum Voter Turnout. (Press #415)
The linkies in question lead me to believe that not getting 50% +1 means taking no action, and is equivalent to a No vote (if the question was formulated in a yes/no format). Other interpretations?
Apparently we voted on this.. Nilly "Sunnydale Press" Mar 9, 2003 1:04:42 am PST
Option 1: An option which receives more than 50% of the vote wins: 57 votes (57%).
Option 2: Whichever option has the most votes wins: 43 votes (43 %).
Which doesn't actually make it clear. And since it is way past my sleepy time I hope y'all figure it out while I dream.