I like voting as much as the next guy, but I haven't used the thread in a year or so and would have to no preference it. It would be ok if the thread participants can come to a decision in thread first. But if voting is our way, then bring on the lightbulbs!
Yeah, I could do that, but I'm paralyzed with not caring very much.
Spike ,'Showtime'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Laura - Jun 25, 2007 4:43:04 am PDT #9750 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.
brenda m - Jun 25, 2007 5:33:55 am PDT #9751 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
We can all vote no preference except for the folks in the thread and see how lopsided a tally we can get.
le nubian - Jun 25, 2007 6:32:48 am PDT #9752 of 10001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
IMO, I would prefer that the thread be kept open until about 1 month after the DVDs are released. Then I think it can go bye bye into the archives.
sumi - Jun 25, 2007 6:39:46 am PDT #9753 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!
What le nubian said.
Particularly since we don't have a Network Drama thread.
Topic!Cindy - Jun 25, 2007 7:02:48 am PDT #9754 of 10001
What is even happening?
I'll put that as an option on the proposal.
Would someone please open Lightbulbs? I have the required number of seconds.
DXMachina - Jun 25, 2007 8:31:38 am PDT #9755 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Lightbulbs is open for discussion.
DXMachina "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Jun 25, 2007 10:30:59 am PDT
sumi - Jun 25, 2007 11:36:32 am PDT #9756 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!
Is the new Cable Drama thread up yet?
esse - Jun 25, 2007 12:01:53 pm PDT #9757 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
Nope. We haven't agreed on a name, slug, or header yet.
Topic!Cindy - Jun 25, 2007 3:58:23 pm PDT #9758 of 10001
What is even happening?
I think the thread Title (the name that sticks with it in each iteration of the thread) should be straight forward and let people know what they'll be getting in the thread: Original Cable Drama.
You can have fun with the naming of each thread, as it rolls over. Make some proposals.
Here's some suggested wording for the slug (home page description) and header (top of thread description):
Slug: Discussions of original cable dramas we watch, that don't fit into the Boxed-Set or Premium Cable threads. NAFDA.
Header: A topic for the discussion of the original cable dramas we watch that don't fit into Boxed-Set because they're not of the Sci-Fi/ fantasy genre, and don't fit into the Premium Cable threads (because not all of us can afford HBO, you know). [list some shows and channels here to give people an idea of what they'll get spoiled for]. Expect adult content. This thread is NAFDA.
Play with it all, until you generate some interest and get something you like, otherwise you're never going to get the thread opened.
Laga - Jun 25, 2007 4:07:29 pm PDT #9759 of 10001
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
Would someone please explain why we need to specify "drama"? Why not "Original Cable Programming"?