I think the cross-pollination of the genres works well. I'm not one who desperately avoids spoilers--I've been known to track them down to soothe suspsense worries (I read the ends of books, too)--so I may not be the best advocate.
Take me, sir. Take me hard.
Zoe ,'War Stories'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Connie Neil - May 17, 2007 2:03:19 pm PDT #9209 of 10001
brillig
Polter-Cow - May 17, 2007 2:12:32 pm PDT #9210 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
My intention (although the board could go another way) wasn't to test drive these threads. It was to get an idea of what shows we watch that generate discussion, and if there were any obvious ways to group them, or if any show we watch generates enough discussion that it deserves its own thread.
Heh. That depends on how much "enough" is. I don't think I've seen a single show dominate a thread the way Heroes sometimes "took over" Boxed Set.
I think the genre sectioning is working pretty well too.
Oh, balls. June 1? Is that going to be when all the discussion is happening? I'm going to be at a conference until June 5. I hope Important Voting doesn't take place while I'm gone.
NoiseDesign - May 17, 2007 2:14:55 pm PDT #9211 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
I've only been able to go into the Reality Thread because the mix of shows in the other threads means there's a lot of stuff I'm not caught up on. I've been enjoying the discussions in Reality about History Channel and Discovery Channel stuff, and I think there might be enough there to support a thread. I'd like to see a split between those shows and the Survivor/Top Designer/etc. type shows since it seems like those discussions aren't crossing much. At least to me.
askye - May 17, 2007 2:30:49 pm PDT #9212 of 10001
Thrive to spite them
I like the threads. However, I think we need to change Comedy and Network Drama to whitefont for awhile because I think people are not able to watch some of the right away and are staying away so they won't get spoiled.
Connie Neil - May 17, 2007 2:37:36 pm PDT #9213 of 10001
brillig
Cable Drama is whitefont, isn't it? I've been wondering why that one hasn't had the same traffic.
Zenkitty - May 17, 2007 3:15:59 pm PDT #9214 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.
Maybe just, fewer people get the premium channels.
askye - May 17, 2007 3:20:44 pm PDT #9215 of 10001
Thrive to spite them
I'm going to catch up on The Riches, I'm just behind and my dvr is messing up.
Steph L. - May 17, 2007 3:27:01 pm PDT #9216 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe
I don't think I've seen a single show dominate a thread the way Heroes sometimes "took over" Boxed Set.
::cough::Smallville S1 in Bitches::cough::
Polter-Cow - May 17, 2007 3:36:54 pm PDT #9217 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
Is that what happened in there??
Topic!Cindy - May 17, 2007 3:37:15 pm PDT #9218 of 10001
What is even happening?
SPN in Boxed Set, now.
Heh. That depends on how much "enough" is. I don't think I've seen a single show dominate a thread the way Heroes sometimes "took over" Boxed Set.
That would be for the board to decide. I figure this might (for instance) give the Bones viewers a chance to realize there are enough of them that they want to propose a thread. It'll be enough if it passes as a ballot measure. Some people might only vote in favor of adding a thread when there's clear domination. Others have a much lower threshhold.
I actually like how the threads are now, but I'm not spoiler averse and I am noticing that some people are absent.