We'd be dead. Can't get paid if you're dead.

Mal ,'Serenity'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


brenda m - Apr 08, 2007 1:13:38 pm PDT #8861 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Even though I almost never watch a show as it airs (I think I'm two weeks behind on everything at the moment) I'm more interested in moving toward more "bucket" threads than individual shows. I agree with Jessica that these are better for the community.

Which is also why I'm in favor of broadening Premium, even if the details of how we do it will be tricky to hash out. Right now there are only 5 or 6 regular posters in there.

Agreed. And I didn't realize that Premium was so limited. I think David was on to something with his "decendants of Homicide" post and I'd really like to hash that out some more.

As far as not keeping up so as not to get spoiled - eh. I don't know. I subscribe and unsubscribe from Boxed Set as I keep up/get behind with the various shows. It works well enough. If you go into the thread around the air time of the show you are watching, that's generally what you'll find being discussed.

So no, if I'm behind on BSG I don't go in the thread on Sunday evenings. A certain amount of consideration for the Tivo/time zone/continent delayed is a good thing. But I don't find it an especially compelling argumet nt against building a thread that might foster better discussion than Natter while still drawing a bigger audience and sparking the cross-pollination and more wide-ranging conversation than a narrowly construed thread would.


Kate P. - Apr 08, 2007 3:19:17 pm PDT #8862 of 10001
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love

I really like the bucket threads, for the reasons that Jessica and others have stated -- it fosters more of a sense of community and helps spread the fannish love of certain shows to people who haven't given them a chance yet. I'm also in favor of the occasional single-show thread for a show with a demonstrably large following and a large volume of discussion, but I think for the shows that generate less discussion, having a few bucket threads would work really well for me.

bon bon, your proposal was for the drama/comedy/reality threads, right? I'd be in favor of something like that, though with slightly more narrowly-defined genres -- more like the "gritty anti-hero dramas with cussing and fucking and Shakespearian overtones" definition that we're slowly cobbling together -- that would still be clear enough for non-readers of that particular thread to still have a good idea of which shows get discussed there. The great difficulty there, of course, is coming up with those clear & useful definitions (I think listing show titles in the slugs or thread headers would definitely help) -- that's going to take both creativity and consensing.


brenda m - Apr 08, 2007 3:31:27 pm PDT #8863 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

I'm not sure that comedy or reality are threads that anyone is calling for, are they? I mean, I get why bon suggested them along with the other, structurally, but I don't think we actually need them. For me, anyway, the reality in Natter works fine. I don't watch many comedies - is there a need that I'm just not aware of? I know people talk about The Office and HIMYM sometimes, any others? Is Natter working for them?

And I do agree with narrowing drama some. Would it be useful to try to tot up what dramas people are watching and discussing, where we're doing it, and which ones seem to need something different? Bones and House pop up in Natter. Once in a while CSI. Grey's Anatomy. I don't think Natter has been bad for any of those, but maybe others see it differently.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 08, 2007 3:31:59 pm PDT #8864 of 10001
What is even happening?

bon bon, I like your idea. If we were to undertake something like that, I think I would want to see us keep Boxed Set, and change Premium Cable to "Premium Blend" (and let the expansion the current premium denizens are requesting happen). Then we could create a standard drama thread (for the rest of the dramas).

What were the other threads you mentioned -- non-scripted and comedy? Odds are that Veronica Mars is canceled. If it's not, it seems unlikely the new format will generate as many posts as the old, so it would be easy to fold into a drama thread, if necessary. Lost will continue, but it doesn't rack up that many posts these days, so it could be folded into Boxed Set, if need be.

I think, with big bucket threads like this, some shows will hardly ever be discussed. I mean, I know the threads sound like they'll be huge, but we don't all watch everything, and not everything we do watch inspires all that much posting. Some shows will rise to the top in each thread. If a show rises so far to the top that it threatens to take over a thread, then we can consider a show thread, and we won't have to be faced with the choice to open a show thread, only to have it generate a few dozen posts per week. We'll already know what kind of traffic it generates.

Sean, just so you know Dr. Who, Torchwood, BSG, and Supernatural seem to me to be the big shows in Boxed Set, now. Heroes was, but it's got it's own thread, which should pick up once this long hiatus is over. Eureka will likely continue to inspire postiness, when it starts its second season. The Dresden Files inspires a few posts each week.


bon bon - Apr 08, 2007 4:13:18 pm PDT #8865 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

bon bon, your proposal was for the drama/comedy/reality threads, right? I'd be in favor of something like that, though with slightly more narrowly-defined genres -- more like the "gritty anti-hero dramas with cussing and fucking and Shakespearian overtones" definition that we're slowly cobbling together -- that would still be clear enough for non-readers of that particular thread to still have a good idea of which shows get discussed there. The great difficulty there, of course, is coming up with those clear & useful definitions (I think listing show titles in the slugs or thread headers would definitely help) -- that's going to take both creativity and consensing.

I just don't think we can do it, and even if we do, we're back here in six months with an expansion of what seemed like a perfect description at the time. I like having a very broad description because (1) it provides finality to the TV debates and (2) prevents confusion over what shows go where.

I'm not sure that comedy or reality are threads that anyone is calling for, are they? I mean, I get why bon suggested them along with the other, structurally, but I don't think we actually need them. For me, anyway, the reality in Natter works fine. I don't watch many comedies - is there a need that I'm just not aware of? I know people talk about The Office and HIMYM sometimes, any others? Is Natter working for them?

Maybe it's just me; I watch a lot more comedy and reality/nonscripted than drama (I'm a philistine). Comedy would cover current discussions like Venture Brothers and other Adult Swim shows; HIMYM; Earl; Ugly Betty would probably fit.

I would agree with keeping Boxed Set and folding Lost and Veronica Mars into bucket threads.


Liese S. - Apr 08, 2007 4:37:25 pm PDT #8866 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

What are you thinking about as far as font goes for bucket threads?


Steph L. - Apr 08, 2007 4:41:06 pm PDT #8867 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

What are you thinking about as far as font goes for bucket threads?

Helvetica. Or maybe a nice Gill Sans.

t /typesetting dork


Topic!Cindy - Apr 08, 2007 4:50:53 pm PDT #8868 of 10001
What is even happening?

Liese, bon bon mentioned white font, here: bon bon "Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?" Apr 7, 2007 12:05:07 pm PDT (toward the end of the post).


Liese S. - Apr 08, 2007 4:54:11 pm PDT #8869 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

<bop Teppy> Hee.

Oh, okay, thanks Cindy.


NoiseDesign - Apr 08, 2007 6:05:06 pm PDT #8870 of 10001
Our wings are not tired

I don't have much to add to this except to throw my voice in with the folks who can't follow the bucket threads. I feel like I don't have a horse in this race because I don't post in the threads being discussed but I don't post in them because they don't work for me. I probably would post in things like a BSG thread or a Stargate thread.