Yup, that.
Thanks, I'm sorry I misinterpreted that. I misstated it a handful of times in this thread.
Off to thread suck and edit.
'The Message'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Yup, that.
Thanks, I'm sorry I misinterpreted that. I misstated it a handful of times in this thread.
Off to thread suck and edit.
When do we stop? When do we say, this is the most information we're going to get, and we aren't going to know any better than this?
Well, I'm thinking we're starting to hit diminishing returns. I mean we could write the States of WI and MN offices of records thingies and ask for death certificates, but I think it's unlikely we'll find any.
eta: Anyway, after that the steps get to be more work, and the probability of finding out anything gets lower.
Or we could do what P-C says and look for evidence he's alive.
Tommyrot's call resolved my doubts. Thanks to everybody who did research; it all cumulated for me. I don't begrudge anybody who needs more information; I'm just saying that I'm not going to worry any more.
I'd agree, with the exception that I do think that an exploratory email would be worth doing. After that, I think we'll eventually learn more, but it may not be by our doing, or any time soon.
This raises the question of whether people would like to leave their real names and addresses and perhaps a contact person with the stompies, in order to have a way to check if someone announces a death or illness. It would need to be voluntary.
This raises the question of whether people would like to leave their real names and addresses and perhaps a contact person with the stompies, in order to have a way to check if someone announces a death or illness. It would need to be voluntary.
Are there that many regulars around here who don't have at least some RL contact with other posters? I'm not being facetious.
I think having a next-of-kin list is weirdly disturbing.
I don't think so, Victor. Certainly enough people have my contact information, plus once you have my last name, you have me. I'm just wondering if we might want to offer the option.
I think having a next-of-kin list is weirdly disturbing.
Hell, I've gone to several massage therapists who asked for a "person to contact" in case I croaked while I was there. Anyway, it wouldn't have to be next of kin - just a friend who lives in the same city or something.
Are there that many regulars around here who don't have at least some RL contact with other posters? I'm not being facetious.
Not sure that I count as a regular, but I've only met one 'ffista IRL, and traded emails and gifts with a few others.