That vote was October last year, I think.
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Oh, I actually just started watching "Veronica Mars"! It's shown here on a cables channel that I don't have, and a friend who has it started taping it and convincing me I have to watch so that she has somebody to discuss the show with, because she felt lonely in her love.
Of course, I won't be able to participate in the proposed thread, if it ever ends up existing, because I won't be watching in "real time" with you guys (yup, I'm still too prude to download episodes. Sigh), and I'll avoid any conversation due to spoilers-to-me, so it's not like my opinion on the matter has any meaningful meaning. But I just had to post the meMeME (or is it "meMeME too"?).
[Edit: so that my post has actual content:
That vote was October last year, I think.
Yup: Perkins "Sunnydale Press" Oct 22, 2004 8:51:27 pm PDT ]
didn't we already vote no on a VM thread?
No. There was a poll to see what shows had enough interest to warrant a formal proposal for a thread. Yeah, it was a bit of a sneaky workaround, but it's been six months anyway so it's a moot point.
That vote was October last year, I think.
Oh, then nevermind.
We have enough seconds, so I've opened Lightbulbs.
Discussion starts here:
DXMachina "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Aug 18, 2005 8:10:12 am PDT
If someone knows they're going to be without internet access during a vote, can the person vote ahead of time, or did we just decide that sometimes, you're out of town, and don't vote?
I don't see why the person couldn't drop a note to the vote counter in advance. Absentee voting makes sense.
Absentee voting makes sense.
Says the woman from Florida.
(oh, come on... someone was gonna go there)
Also, I'd think that could be allowable. I mean, it'd still be one vote/one Buffista.
I only see a problem with that if the ballot was somehow very complicated. I don't know that that's a real concern, the ballots I can remember have been clear and straightforward.
The only theoretical problem (which I don't think will apply in this case) is that the wording of the ballot is not finalized until just before voting starts.