Wesley: Hey. Hey, Gunn. Is something weird going on? … Charles, you just peed on my shoes. Gunn: I'll be damned. That's weird.

'Life of the Party'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Beverly - Mar 23, 2005 9:24:50 pm PST #4105 of 10001
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

Thread naming is getting so contentious we need to be boring and just number them already. Sheesh. Some people got no humor. Some other people got no imagination. And some other other people got no patience.

Me? I'm a curmudgeon. I got none o' the above.


Kat - Mar 23, 2005 9:25:52 pm PST #4106 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

we need to be boring and just number them already.

Agreed. Is this a proposal, Beverly, cause then I'm seconding? (hee hee)

I'm good with the current title as is.


JenP - Mar 23, 2005 9:32:01 pm PST #4107 of 10001

I'd third it. For Natter, that is.


DavidS - Mar 24, 2005 4:13:59 am PST #4108 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Aww, fuck, I don't want to stop naming threads. That's a big part of our culture here whether Kat likes it or not.


§ ita § - Mar 24, 2005 4:18:33 am PST #4109 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Thread naming isn't as fun for me as it used to be. It seems people take it more seriously than before, whether it be to offend or be offended or just get het up that thread titles are wrong.

It's nice when it's a fun and unifying experience.


DavidS - Mar 24, 2005 4:31:58 am PST #4110 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

It's nice when it's a fun and unifying experience.

Yeah, that's what I'd like to get back to. But if we can't agree on something as innocuous as thread titles, then there's something wrong with us. And I'm not ready to concede that we're too fucked up to treat this process with the lightness and play it deserves.

Be it resolved, thread naming is play, but it's not a competition. Bullshit consensus rules. Keep it light, no sour faces, no backbiting.


Jesse - Mar 24, 2005 4:33:43 am PST #4111 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I think part of it is just the fact that we've done this 137 times just since the Phoenix opened. Maybe we should make the new people name the threads.


Pix - Mar 24, 2005 4:37:54 am PST #4112 of 10001
The status is NOT quo.

I'm new(ish)!

I will love them and hold them and call them all George.


§ ita § - Mar 24, 2005 4:41:25 am PST #4113 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

if we can't agree on something as innocuous as thread titles, then there's something wrong with us

My diagnosis isn't quite as dire.

I used to think that the title I liked best should win every time, but it's much more fun not caring.

*I* propose the stompy on hand picks whatever of the suggestions they like the best, or something out of their own head.

Because if the wrong thread title (assuming the stompies don't go insane with this heady new power) breaks people -- then there's a problem.


Polter-Cow - Mar 24, 2005 4:41:40 am PST #4114 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

All your thread titles are belong to me.