I'd vote for it, but the interrobang is too regularly repeated. It doesn't fully channel the rage of the statement.
She's not just a blob of energy, she's also a 14-year-old hormone bomb.
Spike ,'The Killer In Me'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
§ ita § - May 03, 2004 5:04:17 pm PDT #400 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
DebetEsse - May 03, 2004 5:06:56 pm PDT #401 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
!!?!?!???!
?
bon bon - May 03, 2004 5:09:11 pm PDT #402 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
ita, you win. Trying to figure out the most meaningful multiple interrobang has broken me.
i go home now
Polter-Cow - May 03, 2004 5:18:16 pm PDT #403 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
I'd vote for it, but the interrobang is too regularly repeated. It doesn't fully channel the rage of the statement.
ita, I give you (and anyone else) full permission to modify the punctuation. I'm not too keen on it myself anyway. I think it has one interrobang too many, for starters.
§ ita § - May 04, 2004 8:15:56 am PDT #404 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Consuela - May 04, 2004 8:21:07 am PDT #405 of 10001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
Thanks, ita. Nice to see the flurry has died down a bit.
§ ita § - May 04, 2004 8:29:06 am PDT #406 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Interesting that the bandwidth doesn't very closely match the visitors after the spike. Fewer people, but staying longer and reading more, I guess.
Nilly - May 04, 2004 8:31:18 am PDT #407 of 10001
Swouncing
Thanks, ita, I love the graphs (but then again, it's me - I would have liked them even if their content were less relevant).
Interesting that the bandwidth doesn't very closely match the visitors after the spike. Fewer people, but staying longer and reading more, I guess.
I was just going to remark on that, but ita was quicker. If I only had time to play with those numbers, find correlations and geek out properly.
Burrell - May 04, 2004 8:35:50 am PDT #408 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
As far as thread naming goes, I feel like a similar pattern often repeats itself. We have several suggestions of short, clever thread titles. Then someone combines them into one longer, clunkier, less clever title. Everyone but me raves over it. It is selected.
Sigh.
Okay, this is so my personal ish.
Carry on.
§ ita § - May 04, 2004 8:43:12 am PDT #409 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
If I only had time to play with those numbers, find correlations and geek out properly.
You could do a paper ...
Then someone combines them into one longer, clunkier, less clever title.
But if well combined (which I think this one is, aside from my aforestated interrobang issues (how about ??!?!!?! ?)), wouldn't that rate as cleverer?