ita, you win. Trying to figure out the most meaningful multiple interrobang has broken me.
i go home now
Willow ,'The Killer In Me'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
ita, you win. Trying to figure out the most meaningful multiple interrobang has broken me.
i go home now
I'd vote for it, but the interrobang is too regularly repeated. It doesn't fully channel the rage of the statement.
ita, I give you (and anyone else) full permission to modify the punctuation. I'm not too keen on it myself anyway. I think it has one interrobang too many, for starters.
Thanks, ita. Nice to see the flurry has died down a bit.
Interesting that the bandwidth doesn't very closely match the visitors after the spike. Fewer people, but staying longer and reading more, I guess.
Thanks, ita, I love the graphs (but then again, it's me - I would have liked them even if their content were less relevant).
Interesting that the bandwidth doesn't very closely match the visitors after the spike. Fewer people, but staying longer and reading more, I guess.
I was just going to remark on that, but ita was quicker. If I only had time to play with those numbers, find correlations and geek out properly.
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
As far as thread naming goes, I feel like a similar pattern often repeats itself. We have several suggestions of short, clever thread titles. Then someone combines them into one longer, clunkier, less clever title. Everyone but me raves over it. It is selected.
Sigh.
Okay, this is so my personal ish.
Carry on.
If I only had time to play with those numbers, find correlations and geek out properly.
You could do a paper ...
Then someone combines them into one longer, clunkier, less clever title.
But if well combined (which I think this one is, aside from my aforestated interrobang issues (how about ??!?!!?! ?)), wouldn't that rate as cleverer?
I'm with Burrell on the pattern. Although I think this one's pretty much okay.
You could do a paper ...
How much of the data do you have? t /I don't believe I'm asking this