I don't think we really need to add to the faq until a question is frequently asked -- ie, more than once or twice.
Anya ,'Touched'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
Changing my vote. Love this.
I don't think we really need to add to the faq until a question is frequently asked -- ie, more than once or twice.
Is this to mean you think it should go in the etiquette guide, or not go anywhere?
Not anywhere for the moment, would be my vote.
For the longest time, I've wanted to say that everything Cindy writes is so deliciously Buffista-ish. In a good way.
Whether we use it or not.
t feels the love
<feels the love>
You guys want some privacy?
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
Love this.
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
Oh. Love it.
I'd vote for it, but the interrobang is too regularly repeated. It doesn't fully channel the rage of the statement.