My vote is for "who are you working for???!!" because of Jesse's double meaning. And because I'd watch an all Jack Bauer channel, if there was one.
Jayne: Yeah, that was some pretty risky sittin' you did there. Wash: That's right, of course, 'cause they wouldn't arrest me if we got boarded, I'm just the pilot. I can always say I was flying the ship by accident.
'Serenity'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Sassy - May 03, 2004 11:00:45 am PDT #371 of 10001
'Til we dance away...
Topic!Cindy - May 03, 2004 11:02:34 am PDT #372 of 10001
What is even happening?
jedichef22 "The Minearverse 2: Getting his words out." May 3, 2004 12:56:16 pm PDT
Does this qualify as spamming, or solicitation, or something?
I'd watch an all Jack Bauer channel, if there was one.
Can there be lots of urgent whispering?
Steph L. - May 03, 2004 11:06:37 am PDT #373 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe
Does this qualify as spamming, or solicitation, or something?
I was wondering the same thing.
Liese S. - May 03, 2004 11:13:04 am PDT #374 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
I dunno. Can we try ignoring it and maybe it'll go away?
msbelle - May 03, 2004 11:13:33 am PDT #375 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Natter 24: Titles are pointless
Natter 24: Does anyone notice
Natter 24: Now with a User Filter
the others are all good.
DXMachina - May 03, 2004 11:17:39 am PDT #376 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Can we try ignoring it and maybe it'll go away?
Yeah. It looks like a one-time appeal to the gods. If it comes back, we'll deal.
Steph L. - May 03, 2004 11:18:04 am PDT #377 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe
Natter 24: Titles are pointless
Heh. Heh heh heh. I've thought for quite a while now that it'd be so much easier to just give them a number and leave it at that. (Like Natter 89, Bitches 71, Bureaucracy 1,005.)
Topic!Cindy - May 03, 2004 11:19:55 am PDT #378 of 10001
What is even happening?
Can we try ignoring it and maybe it'll go away?
Yeah. It looks like a one-time appeal to the gods. If it comes back, we'll deal.
Sorry, I posted before I saw this. Want I should delete my post?
Pix - May 03, 2004 11:21:04 am PDT #379 of 10001
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie
I like Four and Twenty Natters Baked in a Pie
Also, just have to suggest with all the references above about how sometimes the talking goes in cycles:
Natter 24: It's Not Repetition, It's Evolution!
or
Natter 24: Proudly Having the Same Conversation since 1997
(or insert appropriate year)
Seriously, though, I like all of the suggestions made. You all funny.
DXMachina - May 03, 2004 11:21:59 am PDT #380 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Sorry, I posted before I saw this.
Of course, there's other schools of thought...
Want I should delete my post?
Nah, it's a good response.