Can we try ignoring it and maybe it'll go away?
Yeah. It looks like a one-time appeal to the gods. If it comes back, we'll deal.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Can we try ignoring it and maybe it'll go away?
Yeah. It looks like a one-time appeal to the gods. If it comes back, we'll deal.
Natter 24: Titles are pointless
Heh. Heh heh heh. I've thought for quite a while now that it'd be so much easier to just give them a number and leave it at that. (Like Natter 89, Bitches 71, Bureaucracy 1,005.)
Can we try ignoring it and maybe it'll go away?
Yeah. It looks like a one-time appeal to the gods. If it comes back, we'll deal.
Sorry, I posted before I saw this. Want I should delete my post?
I like Four and Twenty Natters Baked in a Pie
Also, just have to suggest with all the references above about how sometimes the talking goes in cycles:
Natter 24: It's Not Repetition, It's Evolution!
or
Natter 24: Proudly Having the Same Conversation since 1997
(or insert appropriate year)
Seriously, though, I like all of the suggestions made. You all funny.
Sorry, I posted before I saw this.
Of course, there's other schools of thought...
Want I should delete my post?
Nah, it's a good response.
Natter 24: We Still Can't Agree How To Say "Pecan"
I like Four and Twenty Natters Baked in a Pie
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
This? Love.
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
This? Love.
Yes, indeed. Because the meta? Large with the funny.
Four and Twenty Natters: WHO ARE YOU BAKING FOR?!?!?!?!?!
Yes!!!