That reminds me -- are we still doing okay financially?
I said I'm sorry. I've made mistakes, but fear was never one of them.
Lilah ,'Conviction (1)'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Lyra Jane - Feb 14, 2005 12:40:00 pm PST #3654 of 10001
Up with the sun
Jesse - Feb 14, 2005 1:52:50 pm PST #3655 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Yep, we're A-OK. I.e., have a year's worth of hosting money sitting in the bank.
Polter-Cow - Feb 14, 2005 4:26:04 pm PST #3656 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
What I gathered from his post was that there was something revealed in Safety Canary that shed light on the prior episodes.
Oh, no. Jon's right. I just meant that for each individual episode, on the rewatch, you know what the muses were really referring to.
arby - Feb 15, 2005 7:32:21 am PST #3657 of 10001
Guy #1: Man, there are so many hipsters around. I hate hipsters! Guy #2: You're at the wrong place. That's like going to Vegas only to say "I hate titties!" --The Warsaw, Williamsburg (OINY)
Jon's right.
Oh - OK.
Can we add something to the FAQ about the spoiler policy for mostly-on-DVD shows (FF, Wonderfalls)? Also were we planning on addressing tags.. just wondering.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2005 7:33:31 am PST #3658 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Addressing tags? In what fashion?
Dana - Feb 15, 2005 7:36:42 am PST #3659 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Tags that are spoilery, I would assume.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2005 7:38:02 am PST #3660 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
But is there a problem that needs to be addressed? Tags have been kept community-acceptably spoiler-free for yonks. If there is going to be heightened sensitivity/requirements, then more detail is needed.
If a tag is thought too spoilery, it should be raised, just like a spoilery post should be called to attention. But that's not new.
Jesse - Feb 15, 2005 7:49:02 am PST #3661 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Yeah, I don't think there's a problem with tags. People tag lines out of context, which does sometimes lead to a little moment of "Oh! So THAT's where that's from" for people who see the thing later, but I feel like as a community we're fine with that.
Steph L. - Feb 15, 2005 7:58:25 am PST #3662 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism
Yeah, people have always tagged NAFDA shows the night the show airs (often changing tags mid-show). As long as the tags aren't spoily for plot/characters, they've always been kosher.
Matt the Bruins fan - Feb 15, 2005 8:35:16 am PST #3663 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Also, spoiler policies no longer apply to Firefly except with regard to the upcoming movie—show DVDs were out before Christmas of 2003.