Were there others, arby? That one was really not telling you anything about the episode, but I whited it out anyway.
'Underneath'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Thank you ita! I know that one wasn't too spoilery, it was more the principle of the thing (and because his stuff about the Message really is spoilery for FF). Others: Polter-Cow's message a little bit down (#4681) could stand to be whited out (from "you can see" through the end). I don't know if this is REALLY ridiculously anal but the documentary (which I've heard is spoilery) has a little anecdote that Matt tBf relates in #4682, which if I were posting I'd whitefont from after "I loved it when" to the "Also" (because it's not that shocking that Bryan Fuller is hot).
his stuff about the Message really is spoilery for FF
FF is fair game everywhere. So details about plot can crop up.
Polter-Cow's message a little bit down (#4681) could stand to be whited out
What P-C said is true of every episode.
I'd whitefont from after "I loved it when" to the "Also"
Do we usually whitefont references to commentary that have nothing to do with the show itself?
FF is fair game everywhere.
Everywhere, or just NAFDA? Minearverse is NAFDA, so FF is definitely fair game there, but I wanted to clarify.
What P-C said is true of every episode.
What I gathered from his post was that there was something revealed in Safety Canary that shed light on the prior episodes.
Do we usually whitefont references to commentary that have nothing to do with the show itself?
I don't think we HAVE to (not in the spoiler policy IIRC), but if it's a funny or cute thing that people might want to see for themselves, I would do it. That's why I said "ridiculously anal".
re: FF - I know it's fair game, but it's not that hard to whitefont major plot spoilers. See "anal" above.
ETA I tend to err on the side of caution in regards to whitefont, so it's OK with me if Buffista policy is more liberal than my personal creed. Do we spell it out (beyond anything unaired etc. in NAFDA) anywhere for the mostly-on-DVD shows such as FF and WF?
Everywhere, or just NAFDA?
Should be everywhere -- not only is the show not this season, the DVDs have been out for over a year by now.
I don't think we HAVE to (not in the spoiler policy IIRC), but if it's a funny or cute thing that people might want to see for themselves, I would do it. That's why I said "ridiculously anal".
Should we also avoid blackfonting any potentially funny or cute but not plot-related quotes from print/web interviews with cast & crew? What Caroline said wouldn't have been spoilery past the first 10 minutes of the premiere broadcast.
Things that are fair game really shouldn't be whitefonted, because that leads to madness.
Should we also avoid blackfonting any potentially funny or cute but not plot-related quotes from print/web interviews with cast & crew?
I should hope not.
What I gathered from his post was that there was something revealed in Safety Canary that shed light on the prior episodes.
Ahh, OK. I didn't read it that way.
Question (and I hope it isn't an inappropriate one)...
CalGal claims that the people on TPW have purchased $150,000 (over 18 months) from links from her site and she gets some kind of commission from that. Does anyone know what the total is for buffistas?