Natter 24: WHO ARE YOU NATTERING FOR?!?!?!?
I like this more than "WORKING".
'Underneath'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Natter 24: WHO ARE YOU NATTERING FOR?!?!?!?
I like this more than "WORKING".
NATTER 24: We Never Close
I like that one.
Perhaps I put on the cranky pants this morning instead of the normal ones....
Are they 2 sizes too small, and made of unlined wool?
I like "who are you working for?!?!?!?!" partly because the answer is obvious: no one.
Me, too. I'm no help whatsoever. I like most of them.
Are they 2 sizes too small, and made of unlined wool?
Well, I am a little bloaty, but the only thing 2 sizes to small is my heart.
but the only thing 2 sizes to small is my heart.
t Cues the Whos to start singing...
Natter 24: WHO ARE YOU NATTERING FOR?!?!?!?
I like the punctuation, plus it's not really limited to 24 watchers, is it?
And I'll say less than 15 people got the blipvert thing, for fuck's sake.
Natter 24: WHO ARE YOU NATTERING FOR?!?!?!?
This is just lovely.
How about: Four and Twenty Natters Baked in a Pie (mmm pie)
Well, I am a little bloaty, but the only thing 2 sizes to small is my heart.
Fah who for-aze!
Dah who dor-aze!
My vote is for "who are you working for???!!" because of Jesse's double meaning. And because I'd watch an all Jack Bauer channel, if there was one.
jedichef22 "The Minearverse 2: Getting his words out." May 3, 2004 12:56:16 pm PDT
Does this qualify as spamming, or solicitation, or something?
I'd watch an all Jack Bauer channel, if there was one.
Can there be lots of urgent whispering?
Does this qualify as spamming, or solicitation, or something?
I was wondering the same thing.