You can still read and post in LJ without actually being registered, right? I could be making this up because I am registered.
Jayne is a girl's name.
River ,'Trash'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Laura - Dec 21, 2004 3:07:02 pm PST #3213 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.
Katie M - Dec 21, 2004 4:04:28 pm PST #3214 of 10001
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies
Yes, you can.
Lyra Jane - Dec 21, 2004 4:54:48 pm PST #3215 of 10001
Up with the sun
You can post comments anonymously, but I don't think you can make community entries without a registration.
I think it would probably work as a contingency plan for a day or so. Registration is free, so I agree that it wouldn't be that different from joining Peoplesforum or WX.
Sue - Dec 21, 2004 5:02:09 pm PST #3216 of 10001
hip deep in pie
I don't think LJ is really a viable contingency. Long comments threads are meddening to navigate, and I think the threadedness would drive us mad. It might work for announcements, but not for regular posting.
brenda m - Dec 21, 2004 5:08:12 pm PST #3217 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Agree with Sue - and the anonymous posting bit could make it even harder to follow.
le nubian - Dec 21, 2004 9:17:37 pm PST #3218 of 10001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
I think Lance needs more than a cluesticking. I actually think he needs an asskicking. Talk about hard-headed. Good grief.
Steph L. - Dec 22, 2004 2:50:13 am PST #3219 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism
Natter is closing in on 10,000. I don't really give a hoot about the specific title, but I'm requesting less....salty titles. Profanity in posts is no big deal (given how often I use it), but thread titles are HUGE font, and they're pretty noticeable at, say, work. So if we could keep the thread titles work-friendly, I'd be grateful.
DXMachina - Dec 22, 2004 2:58:29 am PST #3220 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I suppose you'll be wanting the whole day off for Christmas, as well...
Steph L. - Dec 22, 2004 2:59:43 am PST #3221 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism
Oy, humbug!
Topic!Cindy - Dec 22, 2004 3:09:54 am PST #3222 of 10001
What is even happening?
I'm with Teppy. Ben reads. Julia is sounding things out, and Chris, the little goober, has learned to rea--basically spontaneously, at age 4.
I unsubbed from B*tches (Spuh-icks buh-it-ka-hees) a while back, for this reason, in case I leave the message center open. To get there, I have to go to the main menu page, uphill, both ways, barefoot, in the snow.
(This is in no way a request to change the name of the Spuh-icks buh-it-ka-hees thread (I'd cry if we did). Just a note that while it's one thing to not subscribe to one thread I read to keep it off the message center page, it starts to get cumbersome and I'll just shut up now, but yeah, what Teppy said.)