No, that's it. Possibly there was a way to get the same ID at all the amazons, but I don't know what it is -- I signed in the same way each time.
Also, I can't seem to move the links around? I click edit and they don't move.
I got stupid. The money was too good.
Jayne ,'Objects In Space'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Jesse - Oct 26, 2004 5:14:08 pm PDT #2779 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Frankenbuddha - Oct 26, 2004 5:27:51 pm PDT #2780 of 10001
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
Count me in for approving bringing back spoilers lite.
DCJensen - Oct 26, 2004 5:36:29 pm PDT #2781 of 10001
All is well that ends in pizza.
I have a proposal up in BBB that might make it moot.
Gus is looking into a method of individual users being able to "turn off" whitefont, basically making it blackfont.
This would allow us to serve both masters in one thread, if it works.
Lyra Jane - Oct 26, 2004 5:45:36 pm PDT #2782 of 10001
Up with the sun
The problem with a code-based solution -- and I don't want to sound like I'm disregarding their work, here -- is that it can only come into practice as quickly as Gud, ita, et. al. can get it up, and I know there are other things they have going on. The check-box will be a great solution when/if we get it, but a spoilers lite thread would be useful right away.
DavidS - Oct 26, 2004 6:06:34 pm PDT #2783 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I don't think turning off the white font really addresses the issue. Spoiler slutting is different culturally than spoiler lite. A hardcore spoiler thread will be about discussion - it won't work if some people are reading some things and some people are reading everything.
People who spoiler slut are (to generalize - not meaning to speak for everybody) not as invested in narrative surprise and are more interested in getting to the re-read, the mulling over, the speculation, the watching the patterns emerge. I'd still be required to white font and be careful about what I'm saying - which is not the point of the spoilers thead at all.
P.M. Marc - Oct 26, 2004 6:09:53 pm PDT #2784 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
What Hec Said.
Though he left out the all-important snark factor.
DebetEsse - Oct 26, 2004 6:10:50 pm PDT #2785 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
Do we not discuss upcoming writers and that kind of thing in Natter? I thought we did.
le nubian - Oct 26, 2004 6:11:48 pm PDT #2786 of 10001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
David really nailed it actually. We spoiler embracers love to discuss shit.
DavidS - Oct 26, 2004 6:14:12 pm PDT #2787 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
What Hec Said.
You know, and she hardly ever says that. Because she's too busy snarking at me.
Sophia Brooks - Oct 26, 2004 6:23:44 pm PDT #2788 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
I agree with Hec. I used to love BOTh the Spoilers Lite thread AND going and reading the great discussions in spoilers after I had been surprised.