Lee, that's the way I underdstand it.
Lyra, as far as I understand, they can re-vote, and then their former vote doesn't count.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Lee, that's the way I underdstand it.
Lyra, as far as I understand, they can re-vote, and then their former vote doesn't count.
What Nilly said.
Runs screaming from the thread having flashbacks....
signed,
was against the no preference option as unnecessarily complicated
So we are going with the rule that No preference votes only count towards the quorum issue, and that when deciding the actual issue, it is only the yes and no votes that matter, even if No preference has more votes than yes or no, right?
Correct. The only purpose for it is to allow people who don't have a preference to chip in toward the minimum vote total, thereby shutting us up on the issue, one way or the other, for six months.
And I really think that's important.
Yes. It's the real point of voting.
I've been no preferencing ever since we started voting.
I have a question that could be shot down or may have already been discussed. When voting takes place, is there any way to put it in the banner on the website?
If this proves to be a technical problem and/or not wanted, I'm not wedded to this idea.
le nubian, voting is already going on. We always announce voting time, and link the ballot in the Press thread. The vote is here: Jon B. "Sunnydale Press" Oct 19, 2004 4:16:56 pm PDT
yeah, I found out about voting and I already voted, but I'm wondering if there are others like me who may not know exactly when voting takes place and would benefit from a banner notice.