I would like to have the would attend/would not attend information.
(eta: also thankful you are taking charge, juliana)
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: New Orleans! May 20-22, 2005!
I would like to have the would attend/would not attend information.
(eta: also thankful you are taking charge, juliana)
You're not railroading Juliana. I was wondering too.
I prefer one vote, but if we do first and second choice or some other form of ranking, that would be okay with me.
I was thinking (and ya'll are free to shoot me) that we could prioritize our choice of cities, 1-4, add up the numbers for each city, and then the city with the lowest number of points would win.
I don't think there's railroading going on - I was actually waiting to get the 2005 F2F voting done with, so we could maybe take a day and talk about Halloween, which is coming up PDQ.
I like the idea of single vote because I'm basing that on the old KISS principle. But, ranking first/second would make sense, and in any case, I'll vote however it's done. Just, let's set it up soon, yes? That way, everyone can relax.
I would like to have the would attend/would not attend information.
(eta: also thankful you are taking charge, juliana)
Agreeing with -t. Will not cry if we don't do the attendance survey, but it would be interesting. Am fine with ranking or with just one choice.
No railroading happening Juliana, I got a bit swamped over the weekend and didn't get this rolling.
So, it sounds like we list the four cities and do it with one vote. Is that correct? Should be put a little blurb with each city given the pricing that we've found to help out the folks that don't follow this thread?
ND, that sounds like a good idea (the pricing info, that is).
So, it sounds like we list the four cities and do it with one vote. Is that correct?
I'm confused. It seems like the later responses made the total split between one vote and can/can't go.
I completely agree that we should provide pricing info, either next to the city choices, or, if that can't be done easily, in one post in this thread that we can easily link back to.
So, it sounds like we list the four cities and do it with one vote. Is that correct?
I think we're having trouble consensing due to low voter turnout, so I'll just pipe up now for one vote.
One vote sounds simpler and easier to me, so I'll go that way.
Simpler is better.