Would it have taken people out of the scene had it been a stunt with a real elephant and not CGI?
Riley ,'Help'
LotR - The Return of the King: "We named the *dog* 'Strider'".
Frodo: Please, what does it always mean, this... this "Aragorn"? Elrond: That's his name. Aragorn, son of Arathorn. Aragorn: I like "Strider." Elrond: We named the *dog* "Strider".
A discussion of Lord of the Rings - The Return of the King. If you're a pervy hobbit fancier, this is the place for you.
Would it have taken people out of the scene had it been a stunt with a real elephant and not CGI?
Do they have elephants who are 8 stories tall?
Would it have taken people out of the scene had it been a stunt with a real elephant and not CGI?
Far less so, for me.
I still have a fairly uncritical "this is so cool" love for the whole scene, whether I was in the movie at a given moment or not.
I'm such a CGI goober. It wasn't until the TTT features that I realised that if the wargs were bits and bytes, the riders? Not so real. And that something like that would apply to the long shots (and some of the close ones, I bet) of the Oliphaunts. And was it capitalised in the book? Is that why I'm annoying myself?
A nice thing about CGI beasties is that they can kill horses willy nilly. I like that.
Ok, smartass man. If they did a scale type thing. Trick photography or something.
t glower at Hec
I'm such a CGI goober.
Heh. That's how I'm going to think of you now.
I'm such a CGI goober.
Heh. That's how I'm going to think of you now.
ita's a peanut made of pixels? And yet, still impressive.
ita's a peanut made of pixels?
Correction: She's a pixel peanut that can kill you with her finger. Or possibly her shell.
Would it have taken people out of the scene had it been a stunt with a real elephant and not CGI?
The CGI Legolas was more distracting than the CGI Oliphaunt. (Since there weren't flesh&blood Oliphaunts to compare them to, they didn't look like effects to me. But CGI Legolas looked fake fake fake. )
Jess, exactly. I kept thinking "Spider-Man!!!"