I don't think she summarized it, but she mentioned it, and she'd probably talk about it. I left her a heads up that you'd been looking for summaries, just in case.
'Time Bomb'
We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
But I'm invested in children reading books that they can understand, and building their reading skills.
Eh. Depends on the kid, I guess. I read lots of books I didn't completely understand when I was a kid. I continue to do so now. I find that part of the fun, really. But not all kids are me. Just as well, really.
As for Gabaldon, I got through to the one where there's a whole mistaken-identity thing and the daughter's boyfriend gets handed off to the Indians, and it all just became too much for me. I won't read any more, although I enjoyed the first two, and the way that Claire came back.
But really, there's far too much sturm and drang for me. (And yes, I know that's hypocritical coming from a Farscape fan.)
Alicia, smonster said she just found an Outlander synopsis that seems pretty comprehensive, here: [link]
She said to pop by her lj or her profile address is good (she said to say she'd posted in Minearverse recently) if you have any questions.
That one kind of lost me. But I loved the first book, and Claire's return, and Jamie and Claire are still some of my favorite fictional characters.
FWIW, I read the Outlander series all out of order and with big gaps in between them and never really felt the lack. I probably missed some subtleties, but there was certainly enough non-subtle stuff going on to keep me from wondering what I'd missed.
there was certainly enough non-subtle stuff going on
i.e., porn.
In kilts
Porn and fighting and kilts, oh my!
But I'm invested in children reading books that they can understand, and building their reading skills.
OK - you've backed off on this - but just to add to your Lord of the Rings example. I read Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur's Court at that age along with Heartbreak House. I missed a lot of the points of the former, and I'm sure almost 100% of the latter - but still enjoyed what I got out of it. What is more being exposed to such things at an early age helped make me the sensible well grounded person I am today. Hold on; I'm not helping my case, am I?
They didn't actually understand what happened in the story, or what was implied. And this is disheartening for me, because I really want them to be engaged and curious and reading something that's manageable, that's going to get them thinking and turning over the pages and wanting to talk about it. I guess that this Pokemon-level interest in HP isn't a bad thing, as such. I just find it depressing.
Fay! There are kids, right there on your lawn! You should do something about that.