That's insane troll logic!

Xander ,'Showtime'


We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good  

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


Kathy A - Jul 13, 2005 9:39:35 am PDT #8172 of 10002
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

( continues...) very accurately portrays obviously a religion.  And it is being read aloud in our classrooms across America, when other religious books have been banned from the classroom. 

SCARBOROUGH:  OK. 

MATRISCIANA:  So that's my issue and that is my concern. 

SCARBOROUGH:  So, you are saying you can't read the Bible, which promotes Christianity, but you can read “Harry Potter,” which you say pushes witchcraft? 

MATRISCIANA:  Well, it's a very, very accurate portrayal of witchcraft.  It also encourages the children to go into Wiccan Web sites in the classroom.  The teaching aids that come along with it do encourage children to learn more about witchcraft. And, certainly, if they are allowed to do that, in all fairness, on all religions, then let's have that in the classroom.  But are all religious...

SCARBOROUGH:  Well, Steve—what do you say to that, Steve?  If this book promotes the occult, if it promotes witchcraft, then why are we letting our kids read it in school? 

ZEITCHIK:  Well, there's a couple of issues here. First of all, I am not convinced that it promotes witchcraft.  If there's elements of witchcraft in it, you know, there are elements of religions and of—I mean, you read—you read “To Kill a Mockingbird,” you want to talk about something unsavory, “To Kill a Mockingbird” has racism in it.
And “Night” by Elie Wiesel has brutality and anti-Semitism in it.  Certainly, there are unsavory things in the world.  And we still read them in our classroom.  In fact, we encourage our children to read them, because I think it will ultimately help them understand the world better.  If the message—look, if the underlying message of this book is not one that any person or parent or principal agrees with, then they should not assign it, the same way they should not assign other books.  But the idea that somehow this “Harry Potter” phenomenon, because of its very success, is indicative of an anti-religious crusade or that it somehow connects to a separation of—or a violation of church and state to me just seems totally absurd. 


JohnSweden - Jul 13, 2005 9:45:26 am PDT #8173 of 10002
I can't even.

I liked his earlier ones Days Between Stations and Rubicon Beach.

I agree with Hec's assessment of Steve Erickson. Very cool writer. Days Between Stations is a bizarre and wonderful book.


Daisy Jane - Jul 13, 2005 9:46:22 am PDT #8174 of 10002
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

No. I think the issue, what I take issue with is that this book very accurately portrays obviously a religion. And it is being read aloud in our classrooms across America, when other religious books have been banned from the classroom.

"very accurately portrays"? The weird candy and magic items "very accurately portray" wicca? Huh.


Jesse - Jul 13, 2005 9:48:08 am PDT #8175 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Hey, Warner Brothers SAID SO. So there. Accurate.


Kathy A - Jul 13, 2005 9:49:21 am PDT #8176 of 10002
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Yeah, I see those witches and wizards apparating everywhere, flying on broomsticks, and being educated on how to transfigure mice into pincushions. Very accurate, indeed.


Daisy Jane - Jul 13, 2005 9:51:02 am PDT #8177 of 10002
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

Dude, Fox is like Bizzaro Daily Show.


Nutty - Jul 13, 2005 9:52:31 am PDT #8178 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Basically, I wouldn't worry about the opinion of someone who has wet dreams about being Dave Barry.

I have a policy whereby, if you're not funny on E!, then you're probably not going to be funny in print. Joel Stein was my source for this theory. At least Mo Rocca can pull of deadpan, one time in five.

Well, it's a very, very accurate portrayal of witchcraft.

If Jessica (and other wiccans) can fly on brooms, and hasn't demonstrated this for people like me, I will be very, very disappointed in her. That goes double if there really is a secret war going on against a haughty rock-star-persona villain who goes by one name. Prince, if only you'd told us!! We would have forgiven you!


brenda m - Jul 13, 2005 9:53:33 am PDT #8179 of 10002
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Yeah, I see those witches and wizards apparating everywhere, flying on broomsticks, and being educated on how to transfigure mice into pincushions. Very accurate, indeed.

Dude, Wiccans can do all that? Jess's been holding out on us.


Atropa - Jul 13, 2005 9:53:39 am PDT #8180 of 10002
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

Yeah, I see those witches and wizards apparating everywhere, flying on broomsticks, and being educated on how to transfigure mice into pincushions. Very accurate, indeed.

Hey, just because some of us are really good at casting Obliviate ...


Steph L. - Jul 13, 2005 9:54:59 am PDT #8181 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

"very accurately portrays"? The weird candy and magic items "very accurately portray" wicca? Huh.

Not to mention EXPECTO PATRONUS!!!