Higher criticism and the lower criticism when it comes to books
Strange are the ways of LOC classification. The only thing I can think of is, "lower" means book reviews and "higher" means "100-page thesis on how this book relates to the price of tea in China."
Because, there is criticism like, "This sucks," and then there is criticism like, "This is an example of how patriarchy is not a monolithic institution."
I'm loving this zombie poem, but my god it's LONG.
Damned funny, though. I went poking about the site, and found only information about this family's cool dogs. Who are they and how do I send them squeeing feedback?
The results of All About Romance's 2004 Cover Contest are now up: [link]
Holy cow. Sarah Zettel wrote a romance?
It's for Harlequin's new Luna line, which I think is more fantasy with strong romantic elements.
Huh. I think of her as a strong science fiction writer, but not a particularly good romance writer. I read her first foray into fantasy, and wasn't overwhelmed with either the novel or the interpersonal elements.
Huh.
I'm glad to see Run No More got the two-image cover nod - it was the most memorable of any of the covers to me.
Well, except for the anatomically confusing cover of
Rumor Has It,
which I'm heartened to see won worst cover honors.
I almost really liked Run No More, but the two covers were too distinct in style for me to love.
The reviews for the worst are making me laugh uncontrollably. I just wish they'd put the image at the top of the page.
The suggested alternate title for "Bushwhacked Groom" made me almost choke on my lunch, I was laughing so hard.