In a non-fiction book intended for a popular audience, is it OK to have an appendix to an appendix? One particular paragraph in the main section will needs a couple of thousand words to prove ; so I put it in an appendix. But then one paragraph in that appendix needs a couple of tables and some calculations to prove. I don't want to interrupt the flow by putting it in the first appendix; but the tables and explanation are too big to reasonably fit in a footnote. And the tables need sourcing, which sort of makes putting them in an endnote problematic. So the appendix to an appendix seems like the best solution, but..
We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Maybe call it a Diagram? Exhibit? Attachment? Annex?
Annex sounds good. Thanks Wolfram.
Tonsil?
Not carbuncle either.
Coccyx?
Tumor?
Can you just put the table at the end of the appendix and refer to it as Table X?
Lagniappe
One of my math textbooks actually had a "lagniappe" section.
Speaking as a reader with no scholarly reading bent aside from hockey books, I'd say adding a little "see figure n" footnote in the appendix and adding it to the end might work. But an appendix to an appendix definitely evokes the image of Burgess Meredith in coke bottle glasses pulling a book off a top library shelf and blowing an inch of dust off it.