Chandler's better.
We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
I thought this crowd might want to make their opinions known in the Locus All-time Fantasy Story Poll.
Thanks for the link, Hec. I too didn't read Hammett till after I'd seen movies made of his work, and like most awkward post-adolescent dummkopfs I was vaguely convinced that because it was "old" it would not be readable. Rather, I find that Hammett's got that great nasty verve you find in 1910s gossip columns and muckraking reporters -- except more cynical.
I think Chandler is glorious, but occasionally talking out of his glorious hindparts; but Hammett writes like a man who has been offered money to do murder (because he is one).
This is true. The words are so pretty, coming out of his ass, and um, that didn't sound right. Hammett is more grounded in reality, but I like Chandler's use of language and find it sexy(Although as a blonde, maybe I should be offended...I'm not sure why I'm not. Maybe I secretly want to be poison.)
The Maltese Falcon is an absolutely amazing book for narrative theory geeks, because the entire story is told from Sam Spade's point of view (we never see anything Sam doesn't see) and yet we never find out a single thing that Sam is thinking, it has no interiority whatsoever.
NB it's possible I'm actually thinking of a different book, in which case I blushingly retract the above.
I think you're right. No need to blush, Angus.
Chandler is so not better than Hammett. He's more fun, but Hammet's flinty coldness is amazing.
it has no interiority whatsoever
Yes, you've got the right book in mind. Totally surprised me, when I read it. I would venture it's almost the sole source of suspense, not not-knowing how to get the falcon, but not-knowing how to feel about the viewpoint character.
I understand what Erika's about, too. When you compare Spade to Chandler's Philip Marlowe, you'll definitely like Marlowe more as a character. Because you can know him, and he's entertaining (and, rarely, moving), and because you can reasonably expect he's a right guy. Spade, you can't ever really be sure, and that's fascinating, but it's also very uncomfortable.
Spade, you can't ever really be sure, and that's fascinating, but it's also very uncomfortable.
True that. I spent most of my read of TMF really disliking Spade.
They didn't list Jack Vance's The Moon Moth, so I refuse to vote.