The new Weasley family motto: Better dead and red.
We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
(puts hands over ears, sings "Star Trek" theme in piercing voice to drown out offensive ideas)
(Places cotton in ears to drown out "Star Trek" songs, and begins eulogy for Weasleys. Any of them. All of them.)
Once upon a time, I just looked down and whatever I was wearing, that is what Anita wore. ... Anita wears more T-shirts now just as I do.
M-A-R-Y S-U-E
At what point are you borrowing from yourself to help create a character, and at what point is she a Mary Sue? Because I worry about that, when I write sometimes and I've not written about singing one way or the other yet.
Some of my favorite characters often get called Mary Sues (I'm thinking Harriet Vane and Phedre in the Kushiel books), and while I can see where the criticism is coming from, I really don't care because the characters are vivid and interesting to me. I wonder if this makes me flawed as a reader and/or a writer.
Went to the library yesterday and discovered that Marian Chesney is M.C. Beaton.
Which upon reflection -- makes a lot of sense.
Don't think vane could reasonably be called a mary sue.Phedre I think so. I find it very suspicious when a character almost never makes a seriously bad choice. Vane made plenty, P not so much.
My understanding is that Harriet is a fairly transparent authorial insertion. The thing is, if I like a character sufficiently, I don't care if they're an authorial insertion, idealized or otherwise.