Cause for all these men to be so beautiful and Anita to be the only XX worth boinking doesn't make any sense at all.
nods again
Although she does describe women in similarly sexual terms - when she introduces a new female character she generally describes their figure in depth, including size of breasts, which may be a characteristic of Jackie Collins-type literature, I don't know, but it seems rather loaded. I mean, homophobic though she clearly is, Anita seems to be checking the girls out. (I'm expecting that LKH is eventually going to give Anita some girl-on-girl action, once she's got past her own squick - the books seem to me to show LKH's personal squick zones shifting fairly rapidly.)
And the ardeur is completely involuntary yet only responds to A Penis.
Yep. The ardeur - it's just - gah! Stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid badfic nonsense! Damn it! Cheesy plot device! ...there are many annoying things about these books. Many. But, yes, I do like the notion of Anita being an Animator, I like Animators Inc, I like that she talks in hard boiled prose most of the time and that she describes her guns so lovingly.
I think Jacqueline Kirby is more a Mary Sue that Elizabeth Peters might want to be.
Ah. Haven't read those books yet. May give them a try, though.
I can't call Amelia a Mary Sue, because Peters is herself an Egyptologist.
Which, twinned with the pictures of Peters dressed as Amelia, would be more liable to make her a Mary Sue, imho - but I don't think Amelia reads as a Mary Sue for the simple reason that we're often encouraged to laugh (affectionately) at her. Peters pokes fun at Amelia, and shows us her weaknesses and her unreliability as a narrator. I think that undercuts any Mary Sue-ishness.
I'm now more than half way through Silhouette in Scarlet and it's definitely an improvement on the first Vicky Bliss book, but I'm not finding it compelling in the way that the Amelia books are. There's a lot more irony in those books - a lot more moments when the gateway character interprets matters one way, and the reader interprets them in a different way. Which is fun.