Anya: We should drop a piano on her. It always works for that creepy cartoon rabbit when he's running from that nice man with the speech impediment. Giles: Yes, or perhaps we could paint a convincing fake tunnel on the side of a mountain.

'Touched'


We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good  

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


Nutty - Jun 10, 2004 4:56:00 am PDT #3215 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

There are permissions specialist who, as part of their job, track down who holds what permission and where that person is. They can make top dollar, and if you've ever tried to clear something with the estate of Frida Kahlo, you understand why. (Let us say there was foot-dragging and procrastination south of the border, and it was the permissions specialist who called up and bothered them every day till they got the signed forms out the door.) When it's really bad, and nobody knows who the copyright holder is, you can go to specialist lawyers, who crawl through crap like probate research.

Copyright law, last I checked, was such that works published in 1923 are free and clear; but works published in 1924 will remains under copyright for another, what, another 15 years. (It was a blanket extension.) You know why 1924, and why the extension 5 years ago? Walt Disney.

Steamboat Willie, and thus copyright ownership (but not trademark, which I think lasts forever) on the character of Mickey Mouse, was about to age out of copyright. Realistically, it's trademark that matters, because it's all about the image/likeness, but let it not be said that a corporation would let go of something it owned. So, huge lobby in Congress, and poof! The Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act.

The first copyright law was 7 years from the date of publication. (And even when it's counted as life-of-author+, it's perforce "counted life-of-author or publication date, whichever is later", to avoid the very circumstance Deb describes above.) We're now up to about 100 years of copyright protection, and in 15 years, I bet Disney will be lobbying to make it 150.


Connie Neil - Jun 10, 2004 5:39:20 am PDT #3216 of 10002
brillig

Spider Robinson wrote a short story about copyright in perpetuity. I can't remember the title. In the story, the wife of a famous song writer is lobbying against the idea, which surprises people. She points out that her husband realized his most famous song was built off a lullaby he'd heard as a child, and if works were copyrighted forever, then there was a good chance that the flow of ideas would eventually be choked off.


deborah grabien - Jun 10, 2004 6:00:35 am PDT #3217 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Nutty's correct on all counts - 1924 was the big divisive year, thanks to Der Maus. The big profitable estates and corps are really big on the "mine forever! mine! MINE!" school of copyright enforcement.

And when you use the IP word - "intellectual property" - cans of worms the size of Cthulu get opened.

The permission specialists are one way to go. It's a lot easier if you have an agent or publisher for your work already; as harrowing as trying to track down the niece of the second cousin twice removed/legatee of Millay's estate was (we were on publishing deadline, and she just stayed invisible for way longer than was comfortable), it would have been far worse without the official letterhead of Pan UK to back it up.


Fred Pete - Jun 10, 2004 6:02:00 am PDT #3218 of 10002
Ann, that's a ferret.

The big profitable estates and corps are really big on the "mine forever! mine! MINE!" school of copyright enforcement.

I always wondered where WB got that aspect of Daffy Duck's character.


deborah grabien - Jun 10, 2004 6:07:06 am PDT #3219 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

I always wondered where WB got that aspect of Daffy Duck's character.

Heh. I seem to remember a small TV documentary on the history of the Warner Brothers cartoons, and the literaly loonytoons who came up with my favourite cartoon critters ever, and there was a lot of deep, deep digging at the Disney boys.

That whole copyright thing - bringing this even more firmly back on topic - is a lynchpin in Kavalier and Klay, as well.


erikaj - Jun 10, 2004 6:20:26 am PDT #3220 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

God, that was good.(But now, stupid me, I'm wrestling with Infinite Jest which is making me feel like a cartoon of a blonde woman. But there are assassins in wheelchairs in it.)


deborah grabien - Jun 10, 2004 6:32:39 am PDT #3221 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

But there are assassins in wheelchairs in it.

Dude, what's not to love?


Calli - Jun 10, 2004 7:19:24 am PDT #3222 of 10002
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Connie, I think the SR story you're thinking of is "Melancholy Elephants".

Mystery novel rec: Last weekend a friend of mine tormented me by reading a novel by Donald Westlake in front of me and giggling. When I finally wrenched Don't Ask from her hands, I loved it. Tonight I'll be heading to the library in the hopes of finding much much more by him.


Connie Neil - Jun 10, 2004 7:36:48 am PDT #3223 of 10002
brillig

Oh, gosh, Westlake is a scream. And, yes! That's the story. I knew it was something about elephants.


deborah grabien - Jun 10, 2004 7:37:19 am PDT #3224 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Hmmm. I was given Don't Ask for Christmas, and have tried three times to get into it. No luck so far.

Maybe I'll give it another pop.