Completely random SG observation (just starting Farscape S4, so I got nothin' for the current discussion) -- in 1969, the woman they have play younger Catherine really looks like she could be a younger version of the the actor who plays older Catherine. This is an amusing episode, what with the Star Trek and Star Wars references. And the clothes.
Have also decided that I don't care about spoilers anymore, so I'm going to watch the special tonight. So weak.
Yeah, I'm watching it too, Jen. I mean, I'm watching the whole series out of order, so spoilers are kind of meaningless to me anyway.
The only thing that really pings me about 1969 is that the clothes they got in the second hand store were not only new looking, but extra hip for 1969. Generally you find older and out of date clothing. What, did the costumers for laugh-in suddenly dump a year's worth of costumes on middle america?
Well, yeah, OK, Teal'c looked a bit ... groovy. Didn't notice it much for the other three.
Watching the triptych season premiere for season 2 on DS9. A little heavy on Bajoran politics, and why the hell is Dax so girly/squeamish about critters?
Also, why the hell did we have to go the whole seven seasons to finally be rid of
Louise Fletcher?
Oh, Sam was totally groovy, with the little glasses, and the Indian prints.
OK, the glasses ... but those were not so uncommon back in the day, right?
Why am I defending costuming choices for SG-1? That way lies madness. I should know this.
I thought Louise Fletcher was brilliant on DS9. So slimily and perfectly untouchably evil.
Why am I defending costuming choices for SG-1?
Green or blue, green or blue -- that should be the only choice.
And black. For the t-shirts. Let us not forget the black t-shirts. Ever.