That's why I noted speculation

Ahh, I wasn't sure where the "ifs" went. I thought you were speculating based on that fact, not on that guess.

Jars -- I don't think we have an official spoiler policy for this thread, but I think whitefonting casting like that is safest. I hope they don't go with your suggestion, because that'd remove Jack from the action, and I love that part of him.

They did show Jack and Carter together in that slave camp ep, where they didn't have a Stargate, but even so, it was quite the stressful reaching for comfort situation. If they could date at SG1, I think it'd work best.

And I don't think Jack'd kick himself, exactly, since he knows a) Sam'd be happy (he hasn't minded too much about her other men, but maybe he knew their expiration dates -- hey, maybe that's why he won't date her...) b) he's made choices. He would be very sad, though, and I hope he'd snark at his own expense.

Katie! Thanks for the link!

So, anyone wanna play with Smallville spec?

Someone at work mentioned something about the mysterious and sexy new man in Lana's life. The one who lost both parents and was telling her to push through the pain. Anyhow, I'm hoping that someone is right.

I'm pretty well Smallville unspoiled (because Smallville spoilers slip through my head like water), but the buzz at work was suspecting/speculating we were seeing some early Dark Knight action under an assumed name here, and that would make me very, very happy.

(Plus, what's his ass is kind of cute, and doesn't *seem* evil.)

Mmmm.

I think I'd need to see him in action with Lex and/or Clark to be sure.

Lots of action.

Dark Knight is Bruce Wayne? In any case, was he shot/horribly injured so that's why he's in PT?

the buzz at work was suspecting/speculating we were seeing some early Dark Knight action under an assumed name here, and that would make me very, very happy.

That would be very, very cool. I don't remember the character's name, if we heard it. And Batman is supposed to show up this season, no?

I watched Charmed last night. Very very bad boots on Phoebe. Also, doesn't creating a man and a feast for Piper's birthday sort of violate the "no magic for personal gain" thing? or is it okay becase Piper herself didn't do the spell?

If the spell was done in order to help someone else, I think it'd be considered okay - well, the feast would - creating the man would be more of a gray area.

I thoought the someone else had to be an unCharmed One.

I think it'd depend more on the purpose of helping - just cheering someone up who's depressed, or healing one who's sick - fine. Arranging it so a sib wins the lottery, or all her enemies just fall over dead, that'd be in the iffy territory. I don't watch the show anymore, I'm just going by the typical magic "no personal gain" kind of rules.

Me too, ita. Otherwise, what would stop them from just trading spells to make each other happy? It's a letter-of-the-law-but-not-the-spirit thing.

But I haven't watched enough Charmed to really understand the canon.