Book: I believe I just... I think I'm on the wrong ship. Inara: Maybe. Or maybe you're exactly where you ought to be.

'Serenity'


Boxed Set, Vol. 1: Smallville, Due South, Farscape  

A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much anything else that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.


Sean K - Dec 09, 2003 7:49:23 am PST #2637 of 10000
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

But no, it all looked exactly the same as it did in S:AAB or Bab5 or Enterprise.

Huh. I can see just a little bit of similarity to S:AAB, but I thought it all looked very different from Bab5 or Enterprise.


Nutty - Dec 09, 2003 7:54:38 am PST #2638 of 10000
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

And I didn't particularly mind that there was nothing (aside from a space armada with giant ships in it) about the world that seemed too terribly advanced technologically, at least compared to us.

It's not a lack of high-tech that annoyed me; it's a lack of different. It was like they set up shop on the Generic Sci Fi Channel Space Ship Set, and then dressed it a little bit (with phone cords).

Space television will insist on using sheetrock for internal walls in a space ship. (They didn't even pretend it was steel.) And they always insist on individual fighters swarming around a large carrier, and those fighters are always shaped like needles with stabilizing wings at the back, and they're always flown by cigar-chomping hotshots.

It was just a resounding lack of creative sideways-thinking in the design. I'd seen it all before. We'll not start in with what I'd seen before in the plotting and the dialogue.


Sean K - Dec 09, 2003 8:01:26 am PST #2639 of 10000
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

And they always insist on individual fighters swarming around a large carrier, and those fighters are always shaped like needles with stabilizing wings at the back, and they're always flown by cigar-chomping hotshots.

Okay, but to be fair, it was the original BG that started pretty much all of those conventions you just stated right there. They're being faithful to the source material.


Consuela - Dec 09, 2003 8:02:03 am PST #2640 of 10000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

It was just a resounding lack of creative sideways-thinking in the design. I'd seen it all before.

Yes, this.

Sorry, Sean, don't mean to harsh your mellow. It's popcorn for me: I'll watch part 2 tonight and fastforward through much of the boring stuff, but I certainly don't think it's in any way particularly creative, either storywise or presentation.

t shrugs


Nutty - Dec 09, 2003 8:05:25 am PST #2641 of 10000
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Yeah, I imaigne that's so (I never watched much of the original). But what's that thing about a foolish consistency?

I don't know. I don't especially care about the show in the slightest. I'm sort of sorry for Sci Fi, since this is one of their Big Annual Movie events. Although I loathed Taken, and thought both Dune movies were flawed, in all three cases I felt like I was really watching an event, and not Straight To Video 3 as would normally be shown on a Sunday afternoon's rotation. It was just -- unremarkable in every way.


Sean K - Dec 09, 2003 8:07:32 am PST #2642 of 10000
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Well, despite my staunch defense of the show, I'm not saying it's the next Big Thing. I'm just saying I liked it well enough, and if they do make a series out of it, I'll watch it.

I don't think it was particularly creative, either, but I don't necessarily need all my TV to be "poked a badger with a spoon" original. I thought it was leaps and bounds better than Enterprise or Jake 2.0 or Voyager.

We just won't be able to share the love on this one. My mellow remains unharshed.


tina f. - Dec 09, 2003 8:07:46 am PST #2643 of 10000

I'm sort of sorry for Sci Fi, since this is one of their Big Annual Movie events.

Thing is - everyone in my office is talking about it. Even the non-sci fi/genre folks watched it. So, in that respect, is was effective for what Sci Fi wanted to do - get viewers.


Steph L. - Dec 09, 2003 8:09:18 am PST #2644 of 10000
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I don't necessarily need all my TV to be "poked a badger with a spoon" original.

::snerk::


DXMachina - Dec 09, 2003 8:09:52 am PST #2645 of 10000
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

The fighter spaceplanes looked like Starfuries, or like X-Wing fighters.

Actually, they looked like the Vipers from the original series. I grant you, that's not original, because the original Battlestar Galactica stole it's look from Star Wars (to the point where Lucas sued them), but the look of the new BG is in keeping with the old. I don't have a problem with that, although I can see how someone coming to the series for the first time might feel that way.

Goes off to sit in the corner with Sean.

eta: or what Sean said. You guys type too frelling fast.


Nutty - Dec 09, 2003 8:12:13 am PST #2646 of 10000
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

I don't necessarily need all my TV to be "poked a badger with a spoon" original.

I do! I do!

(Okay, not really.)

But in the end, I was sort of sorry I hadn't watched Everwood instead. And I don't especially watch Everwood, only for glimpses of Holli's Secret Boyfriend playing piano. Peter Jennings talking about corn subsidies was more interesting, to me. (Yes, I did watch that, and yes, it was interesting!)