(Faith for a night, Seth longer term)
yet again, meara is me.
Angel: He is dead. Technically, he's undead. It's a zombie. Connor: What's a zombie? Angel: It's an undead thing. Connor: Like you? Angel: No, zombies are slow-moving, dimwitted things that crave human flesh. Connor: Like you. Angel: No! It's different. Trust me.
'Destiny'
Boxed Set, Vol. 1: Smallville, Due South, Farscape
A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much anything else that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
smonster - Nov 25, 2003 10:34:26 am PST #2433 of 10000
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.
Kat - Nov 25, 2003 10:50:41 am PST #2434 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
Random question: is there enough interest among buffistas to start an OC thread at PF?
tina f. - Nov 25, 2003 11:23:38 am PST #2435 of 10000
I've never used PF (I lurked a couple of times when the Phoenix was down, but have never posted) - but I am willing to try it if that is where the buffista O.C. talk migrates to.
I am ready to have this shot down in one fell swoop - but here goes - how about an OC thread here once we move servers and are comfy at the new place?
I really don't understand the process of new thread starting - so this question could already be mooty mcmooterson. Just thought I would ask.
DavidS - Nov 25, 2003 12:45:46 pm PST #2436 of 10000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I really don't understand the process of new thread starting - so this question could already be mooty mcmooterson. Just thought I would ask.
There's a voting process to create new threads, because new threads create new volume and that puts a load on our connections. Also, there's been a lot of philosophical debate about how broadly the Buffista board should be defined, and there was resistance to even just a general TV thread, so it's unlikely an OC thread would get started here. However, there definitely seems to be a critical mass of OC interest, so I'm sure a PF thread would be lively.
Kat - Nov 25, 2003 1:00:20 pm PST #2437 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
and there was resistance to even just a general TV thread, so it's unlikely an OC thread would get started here.
Much of that resistance coming from me! So I thought I'd propose PF instead.
DavidS - Nov 25, 2003 1:01:41 pm PST #2438 of 10000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Much of that resistance coming from me!
Viva la Resistance!
amych - Nov 25, 2003 1:13:09 pm PST #2439 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Hmm... I'd much rather just discuss the OC in this thread -- even if we didn't want it to be a general TV thread, the understanding has always been that this thread wouldn't just be about the shows in the title.
And it's hard to describe just how much I hate PF. I find it unnavigable, ugly, and utterly frustrating to deal with. So if the discussion moves over there, I won't be following.
P.M. Marc - Nov 25, 2003 1:13:52 pm PST #2440 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
And it's hard to describe just how much I hate PF. I find it unnavigable, ugly, and utterly frustrating to deal with. So if the discussion moves over there, I won't be following.
Yeah, with Amych.
I tried PF, but it gives me hives.
§ ita § - Nov 25, 2003 1:14:10 pm PST #2441 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Me, I'd rather just discuss OC ... wherever. Natter, mostly.
Kat - Nov 25, 2003 1:16:59 pm PST #2442 of 10000
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I don't mind discussing it in Natter. It feels weird to discuss it here because it isn't SV/FS/DS -- like thread hijacking.