Hmm. It's sounds like the finest party I can imagine getting paid to go to.

Mal ,'Shindig'


Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.  

This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.


UTTAD - Aug 01, 2003 4:51:01 am PDT #4030 of 10001
Strawberry disappointment.

amych: Okay dokey.

Lady O' Spain: Good point.


Cindy - Aug 01, 2003 4:57:03 am PDT #4031 of 10001
Nobody

(UTTAD - Bronzer-my-Bronzer, it's really easy. Okay, granted, we learned HTML for the Bronze, and then iB for the haven. Learning yet a new code at first feels like the first step in a journey that'll probably take you elsewhere in the long run. But it doesn't have to.)

(Quick-edit code (which is linked right above the posting box, and when you click that link, you get a pop-up with the quick-edit codes, but don't lose your post-in-progress) is easy. And in this instance, if you put a greater-than carat ( > ) ahead of the section you're quoting, it both indents it and sets it in different font, and you don't have to close the tag. Hitting the return key (enter key, whatever, I'm a typist in a PC world) will close the quick-edit code all by itself.)

EDITED for the right, damned carat.

t /mathphobe


Jessica - Aug 01, 2003 4:59:19 am PDT #4032 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

And in this instance, if you put a less-than carat ( < ) ahead of the section you're quoting, it both indents it and sets it in different font, and you don't have to close the tag.

(Pssst, Cindy! Wrong carat!)


Cindy - Aug 01, 2003 5:03:08 am PDT #4033 of 10001
Nobody

Hee. Thanks, Jess. I was on the phone and didn't even see it.

Sorry UTTAD.


UTTAD - Aug 01, 2003 5:03:25 am PDT #4034 of 10001
Strawberry disappointment.

Cindy: I know, I know ... but I'm a longhand html traditionalist. I'll have to learn these new fangled wacky codes all you kids are using these days.



Lets have a go:

Cindy: I know, I know ... but I'm a longhand html traditionalist. I'll have to learn these new fangled wacky codes all you kids are using these days.



oooOOOooo. Cool.


Jessica - Aug 01, 2003 5:05:15 am PDT #4035 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

The longhand HTML for TT-style quoted text is

t tt t blockquote quoted text goes here t /blockquote t /tt


UTTAD - Aug 01, 2003 5:06:28 am PDT #4036 of 10001
Strawberry disappointment.

See I was all font size="1". Jeez I'm showing my age! I'll get me pipe and slippers.


Cindy - Aug 01, 2003 5:06:34 am PDT #4037 of 10001
Nobody

Try the spoiler code. All you have to do is put an s in front of the stuff you want whited-out, and you're good to go. (Plus, some people's browsers don't recognize the font color="white" coding, anyhow).

See - it's really easy.

* See it's really easy. All I had to do was type the letter s, leave a space and start this message. *


UTTAD - Aug 01, 2003 5:07:36 am PDT #4038 of 10001
Strawberry disappointment.

Okay here goes.

testy mctest

Whoa! Is there nothing that scientist can't do these days?


JenP - Aug 01, 2003 5:36:48 am PDT #4039 of 10001

Buffy didn't instantly trust Angel, nor was she able to be 100% comfortable with him all the way through S3. Enemies, for example. That's part of why bringing him back worked. They showed the aftermath, and the discomfort. They showed the whole adjustment.
Angel wasn't Angelus, but no one just accepted it and moved on. They dealt, sometimes painfully, with it. Had they SHOWN rather than TOLD us what was going on with Spike, it could have played better.

Thanks for the link, P.M. - a good read. I agree - the aftermath wasn't dealt with nearly well enough for Spike. I fanwanked much that we didn't see. And, I agree that the metaphor is dicey -- it doesn't actually work for me (soul/no-soul) in any real world metaphor way. I have been able to ignore that fact and use my take on it to allow me to understand and evaluate things to my own satisfaction in the 'verse's terms (not perfectly, but enough so that it doesn't kill the joy for me because of something making the kind of sense that's not. And, off-topic, I adore Oz).

edited to fix the quote