Warm reconciliation scene.
Dawn ,'Selfless'
Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.
This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.
Xander banging his head into the mirror and cackling "Where's Anya? Where's Anya?" t /still bitter over Twin Peaks finale
Anne, my sister.
See, you all make really articulate cases for Spike not being staked. The problem is (sorry, Ted) the writers have fallen down on the job. I mean S3 Angel by all rights should have been staked after the whole Angelus thing. The reason we were able to move past it is because the writers made sure that we (the audience) could separate Angel from Angelus. It would have seemed heartless to kill Angel for Angelus' sins. Now, I think it would be very interesting to see Spike remain the same after being ensouled. Or to see his struggle to find his own identity, separate from Angel. However, it's all tainted (at least for me) by his relationship with Buffy. Take Buffy out of the equation and it could be really interesting and entertaining.
Xander banging his head into the mirror and cackling "Where's Anya? Where's Anya?"
Snerkity snerk.
See, you all make really articulate cases for Spike not being staked. The problem is (sorry, Ted) the writers have fallen down on the job.
Gloomcookie, I was just thinking the very same thing. I read the thoughful analysis here on the board and I think, where's *that* show? That's the show I want to watch.
See, you all make really articulate cases for Spike not being staked.
GC, I'm arguing something slightly different. If Spike had been staked because he'd gone back to feeding on people, no problem. He became the enemy soldier again, and if Buffy had no reason to know about the trigger, she couldn't be blamed for not acting on that info.
I'm just saying that Wood had no special moral ground to stake Spike over the death of his mother. For the reasons I gave above.
w/r/t the finale....
Well, I think that there's going to have to be a Slayer transferrence of power, so that there's only one Slayer again. Faith mentioned it in the last episode, and that's not the kind of thing she normally mentions (although, yes, a few years in the slammer have given her some maturity).
And the quickly-forgotten Botox Eye said the Slayer line was fucked up. (I will be PISSED if they pull a S5-ending trick ["Oh, remember the dagon sphere from 15 episodes ago?" and suddenly start talking about the damn creepy eye thing.)
I feel like it's been set up that a transferrence of power is going to happen.
So, Buffy to Faith, or Faith to Buffy?
Or will Buffy die (again), thus ending the problem?
Will Faith die, and Buffy have to transfer her power to hat!girl? (I'm not spoiled; just thinking of what SiT would REALLY irritate me to be Slayer.)
Or if Faith dies, will Buffy *take* the power from the new Slayer?
I'm thinking that *Buffy* is the one whose power has to be transferred, because *she's* the one who shouldn't be there.
Thoughts?
(Sorry, it's lunchtime here. So I don't have cereal on my mind.)
I read the thoughful analysis here on the board and I think, where's *that* show? That's the show I want to watch.
Er, um, uh, you know, there could be a S8. We'd just need a thread so we could write it ourselves....
Fred, I understand all of the arguments and see the points. I just don't agree. I think Wood became twisted in his quest for his mother's killer but I still think he would have been justified in killing him. Torturing him? NSM.
So do you think there are others who would be justified in staking Spike? If so, I'd be interested in who and for what reasons.