Frankly, statutory research gets us nowhere at this point.
Yeah - I agree. I saw some questions about what the DMCA covered and thought this might help.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Frankly, statutory research gets us nowhere at this point.
Yeah - I agree. I saw some questions about what the DMCA covered and thought this might help.
I was a bit snippy. But legal at 20th doesn't care whether it falls under the statute or not-- they'll send a C&D if they feel their interests are being threatened, and they won't hesitate to file a complaint.
But legal at 20th doesn't care whether it falls under the statute or not-- they'll send a C&D if they feel their interests are being threatened, and they won't hesitate to file a complaint.
True this. See Buffy Cross & Stake, which got slapped with a C&D due to images AND spoilers.
Maybe the C&D will be to get us to stop calling that poor woman about the DVDs.
Maybe the C&D will be to get us to stop calling that poor woman about the DVDs.
Maybe it's time for a trade: "We'll be nice; jut give us the fucking DVDs."
Of course, lack of DVDs is the whole reason behind the alleged naughtyness in the first place.
There are 666 new posts for me in Minearverse. I'm not sure what that means, but I am scared. ijs.
I've been seeing a trend lately with intellectual property issues to skip the C&D and jump right to filing a suit. It's happened to a few theatres over use of music.
There are 666 new posts for me in Minearverse. I'm not sure what that means, but I am scared.
Snerk.
And for the record, there was a listen'n'post 'cause Tim had another radio interview. And Tim himself showed up while he was on hold.
And for the record, there was a listen'n'post 'cause Tim had another radio interview. And Tim himself showed up while he was on hold.
That's like mega-meta, or no, but like when you have a mirror in front of you and a mirror behind you and...wow. I'm dizzy, now. Or still. Or what have you.
I'm not sure if this has been debated before, so forgive me if it's old ground -- but I'm wondering if it would be possible to update or expand the glossary? I'm asking this without really knowing exactly what needs to be expanded -- things like "blipverts" for example? I suppose it would be a terrible pain in the butt to program it like the html/quick-edit pop up works, but that would certainly be helpful to newbies like myself. I've picked up a lot since I started posting, but I often have to ask irritating questions in the middle of conversations if I want to know what's going on. I'd much rather go look it up and not interrupt the flow of the conversation.
I think sometimes the language becomes such second-nature to long-time posters that they forget how confusing it can be. Anyway, no worries if the answer is "No, newbie! Lurk more! Use context clues!" Just thought I'd ask.
Thanks!