well, no. There is actually no procedure set up right now.
Buffy ,'Help'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Ten people could back channel right now and decide to warn somebody for nothing at all. It could be Z and nine personalities.
This was mentioned in the voting thread, and it was pretty much agreed that something like this would be obvious and it would be invalid.
Shouldn't this discussion be in Light Bulbs, since it directly concerns msbelle's proposal?
That was my understanding.
Ten people could just take a dislike to someone and do the same. Did X violate community standards or did X annoy ten pals?
I'm getting off for a bit, but will be back on before the discussion in lightbulb closes at midnight.
Jon, if you are around, I will post my final language in that thread.
[moved to Bulbs]
Wolfram easily annoyed ten people with what turned out to be a style (as opposed to his intent) that didn't didn't bother a bunch of others.
But nobody suggested that official action be taken against him. Not one person.
Wolfram easily annoyed ten people with what turned out to be a style (as opposed to his intent) that didn't didn't bother a bunch of others.
But annoyed to the point that they would second a warning? I know that I was annoyed, and I expressed my annoyance, but it wasn't anywhere near that point. Not by a long shot.
Wolfram easily annoyed ten people with what turned out to be a style (as opposed to his intent) that didn't didn't bother a bunch of others.
But no one asked that he be warned. Maybe I'm Polyanna, but I have a tough time believing that ten of us could all be that immature at the same time. I prefer to assume that we'll act like adults.